Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inter-reader variability when applying the 2013 Fleischner guidelines for potential solitary subsolid lung nodules.
Penn, Alex; Ma, Mingming; Chou, Benjamin B; Tseng, Jeffrey R; Phan, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Penn A; Department of Radiology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA alex3005@stanford.edu.
  • Ma M; Department of Radiology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA.
  • Chou BB; Department of Radiology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA.
  • Tseng JR; Department of Radiology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA.
  • Phan P; Department of Radiology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA.
Acta Radiol ; 56(10): 1180-6, 2015 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25293951
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2013, the Fleischner Society published recommendations for managing subsolid pulmonary nodules. Inter-reader variability has not yet been defined and has potential implications for the ease and reproducibility of applying the guidelines to clinical practice.

PURPOSE:

To evaluate inter-reader variability when applying the 2013 Fleischner guidelines for potential solitary subsolid lung nodules. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Potential nodules were identified through a systematic retrospective review of CT studies that reported a ground-glass lesion. Three radiologists decided whether these lesions fit criteria of a subsolid nodule and thus merit application of the Fleischner Society guidelines, determined if a solid component was present, and measured each component in two dimensions. Final management recommendations were based on these intermediate decisions. Inter-reader variability for management was calculated and Fleiss' kappa was used to determine significance. Logistic regression and Fisher's exact test determined whether management was contingent on each intermediate decision.

RESULTS:

Forty-four nodules with mean diameter of 9.4 mm were evaluated by three radiologists. Final management recommendations were in agreement for 93 out of 132 cases (70.4%, kappa = 0.56). Inter-reader variability in management recommendation was contingent on disagreement over whether a pulmonary lesion fit criteria of a subsolid nodule for 24 cases (P < 0.01), whether there was a solid component for 10 cases (P = 0.01), and whether the measurement met the threshold of 5 mm for five cases (P = 0.12).

CONCLUSION:

There is moderate inter-reader variability when applying the 2013 Fleischner Society management recommendations. Significant contributors of variability include whether the potential lesions fit subsolid nodule criteria and whether a solid component is present. Measurement variability does not significantly affect the final management decisions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article