Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Epidural steroid injections, conservative treatment, or combination treatment for cervical radicular pain: a multicenter, randomized, comparative-effectiveness study.
Cohen, Steven P; Hayek, Salim; Semenov, Yevgeny; Pasquina, Paul F; White, Ronald L; Veizi, Elias; Huang, Julie H Y; Kurihara, Connie; Zhao, Zirong; Guthmiller, Kevin B; Griffith, Scott R; Verdun, Aubrey V; Giampetro, David M; Vorobeychik, Yakov.
Afiliação
  • Cohen SP; From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland (S.P.C.); Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.); Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Anesthesiology ; 121(5): 1045-55, 2014 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25335172
BACKGROUND: Cervical radicular pain is a major cause of disability. No studies have been published comparing different types of nonsurgical therapy. METHODS: A comparative-effectiveness study was performed in 169 patients with cervical radicular pain less than 4 yr in duration. Participants received nortriptyline and/or gabapentin plus physical therapies, up to three cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI) or combination treatment over 6 months. The primary outcome measure was average arm pain on a 0 to 10 scale at 1 month. RESULTS: One-month arm pain scores were 3.5 (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in the combination group, 4.2 (CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in ESI patients, and 4.3 (CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in individuals treated conservatively (P = 0.26). Combination group patients experienced a mean reduction of -3.1 (95% CI, -3.8 to -2.3) in average arm pain at 1 month versus -1.8 (CI, -2.5 to -1.2) in the conservative group and -2.0 (CI, -2.7 to -1.3) in ESI patients (P = 0.035). For neck pain, a mean reduction of -2.2 (95% CI, -3.0 to -1.5) was noted in combination patients versus -1.2 (CI, -1.9 to -0.5) in conservative group patients and -1.1 (CI, -1.8 to -0.4) in those who received ESI; P = 0.064). Three-month posttreatment, 56.9% of patients treated with combination therapy experienced a positive outcome versus 26.8% in the conservative group and 36.7% in ESI patients (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: For the primary outcome measure, no significant differences were found between treatments, although combination therapy provided better improvement than stand-alone treatment on some measures. Whereas these results suggest an interdisciplinary approach to neck pain may improve outcomes, confirmatory studies are needed.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esteroides / Cervicalgia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esteroides / Cervicalgia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article