Characterization of an anesthetized dog model of transient cardiac ischemia and rapid pacing: a pilot study for preclinical assessment of the potential for proarrhythmic risk of novel drug candidates.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Preclinical proarrhythmic risk assessment of drug candidates is focused predominantly on arrhythmias arising from repolarization abnormalities. However, drug-induced cardiac conduction slowing is associated with significant risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in a setting of cardiac ischemia. Therefore, we optimized and characterized an anesthetized dog model to evaluate the potential proarrhythmic risk of drug candidates in ischemic heart disease patients. METHODS: Anesthetized dogs were instrumented with atrial and ventricular epicardial electrodes for pacing and measurement of conduction times, and a balloon occluder and flow probe placed around the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) distal to the first branch. Conduction times, ECG intervals and incidence of arrhythmias were assessed serially at the end of each dose infusion (flecainide 0.32, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5 and 5mg/kg, i.v.; dofetilide1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 µg/kg, i.v.; or vehicle; n=6/group) both during normal flow (with and without rapid pacing) and during 5-min LAD occlusion (with and without rapid pacing). Compound X, a development candidate with mild conduction slowing activity, was also evaluated. RESULTS: Flecainide produced pronounced, dose-dependent slowing of conduction that was exacerbated during ischemia and rapid pacing. In addition, ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) occurred in 4 of 6 dogs (3 VF @ 0.63 mg/kg; 1VT @ 2.5mg/kg). In contrast, no animals in the vehicle group developed arrhythmias. Dofetilide, a potent IKr blocker that does not slow conduction, prolonged QT interval but did not cause further conduction slowing during ischemia with or without pacing and there were no arrhythmias. Compound X, like flecainide, produced marked conduction slowing and arrhythmias (VT, VF) during ischemia and pacing. DISCUSSION: This model may be useful to more accurately define shifts in safety margins in a setting of ischemia and increased cardiac demand for drugs that slow conduction.