Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of Argus® II retinal prosthesis by blind subjects to achieve localisation and prehension of objects in 3-dimensional space.
Luo, Yvonne Hsu-Lin; Zhong, Joe Jianjiang; da Cruz, Lyndon.
Afiliação
  • Luo YH; Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute of Health Research, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 162 City Road, London, EC1V 2PD, UK. h.luo.96@cantab.net.
  • Zhong JJ; Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath Street, London, EC1V 9EL, UK. h.luo.96@cantab.net.
  • da Cruz L; Vitreoretinal Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 162 City Road, London, EC1V 2PD, UK. h.luo.96@cantab.net.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 253(11): 1907-14, 2015 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25547618
BACKGROUND: The Argus® II retinal prosthesis system has entered mainstream treatment for patients blind from Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP). We set out to evaluate the use of this system by blind subjects to achieve object localisation and prehension in 3-dimensional space. METHODS: This is a single-centre, prospective, internally-controlled case series involving 5 blind RP subjects who received the Argus® II implant. The subjects were instructed to visually locate, reach and grasp (i.e. prehension) a small white cuboid object placed at random locations on a black worktop. A flashing LED beacon was attached to the reaching index finger (as a finger marker) to assess the effect of enhanced finger visualisation on performance. Tasks were performed with the prosthesis switched "on" or "off" and with the finger marker switched "on" or "off". Forty-eight trials were performed per subject. Trajectory of each subject's hand movement during the task was recorded by a 3D motion-capture unit (Qualysis®, see supplementary video) and analysed using a MATLAB script. RESULT: Percentage of successful prehension±standard deviation was: 71.3 ± 27.1 % with prosthesis on and finger marker on; 77.5 ± 24.5 % with prosthesis on and finger marker off; 0.0 ± 0.0 % with prosthesis off and finger marker on, and 0.00 ± 0.00 % with prosthesis off and finger marker off. The finger marker did not have a significant effect on performance (P = 0.546 and 1, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, with prosthesis on and off respectively). With prosthesis off, none of the subjects were able to visually locate the target object and no initiation of prehension was attempted. With prosthesis on, prehension was initiated on 82.5 % (range 59-100 %) of the trials with 89.0 % (range 66.7-100 %) achieving successful prehension. CONCLUSION: Argus® II subjects were able to achieve object localisation and prehension better with their prosthesis switched on than off.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reconhecimento Visual de Modelos / Propriocepção / Desempenho Psicomotor / Retina / Retinose Pigmentar / Cegueira / Próteses Visuais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reconhecimento Visual de Modelos / Propriocepção / Desempenho Psicomotor / Retina / Retinose Pigmentar / Cegueira / Próteses Visuais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article