Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mapping evolutionary process: a multi-taxa approach to conservation prioritization.
Thomassen, Henri A; Fuller, Trevon; Buermann, Wolfgang; Milá, Borja; Kieswetter, Charles M; Jarrín-V, Pablo; Cameron, Susan E; Mason, Eliza; Schweizer, Rena; Schlunegger, Jasmin; Chan, Janice; Wang, Ophelia; Peralvo, Manuel; Schneider, Christopher J; Graham, Catherine H; Pollinger, John P; Saatchi, Sassan; Wayne, Robert K; Smith, Thomas B.
Afiliação
  • Thomassen HA; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Fuller T; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Buermann W; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Milá B; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Madrid, Spain.
  • Kieswetter CM; Department of Biology, Boston University Boston, MA, USA.
  • Jarrín-V P; Yasuni Research Station, Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Quito, Ecuador.
  • Cameron SE; Museum of Comparative Zoology and Center for the Environment, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Mason E; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Schweizer R; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Schlunegger J; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Chan J; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Wang O; Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
  • Peralvo M; Unidad de Biodiversidad y Geografía Aplicada CONDESAN, Quito, Ecuador.
  • Schneider CJ; Department of Biology, Boston University Boston, MA, USA.
  • Graham CH; Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University New York, NY, USA.
  • Pollinger JP; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Saatchi S; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, USA.
  • Wayne RK; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Smith TB; Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Evol Appl ; 4(2): 397-413, 2011 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25567981
ABSTRACT
Human-induced land use changes are causing extensive habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species are not able to shift their ranges in response to climate change and will likely need to adapt in situ to changing climate conditions. Consequently, a prudent strategy to maintain the ability of populations to adapt is to focus conservation efforts on areas where levels of intraspecific variation are high. By doing so, the potential for an evolutionary response to environmental change is maximized. Here, we use modeling approaches in conjunction with environmental variables to model species distributions and patterns of genetic and morphological variation in seven Ecuadorian amphibian, bird, and mammal species. We then used reserve selection software to prioritize areas for conservation based on intraspecific variation or species-level diversity. Reserves selected using species richness and complementarity showed little overlap with those based on genetic and morphological variation. Priority areas for intraspecific variation were mainly located along the slopes of the Andes and were largely concordant among species, but were not well represented in existing reserves. Our results imply that in order to maximize representation of intraspecific variation in reserves, genetic and morphological variation should be included in conservation prioritization.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article