Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantitative motor unit action potential analysis of supraspinatus, infraspinatus, deltoideus and biceps femoris muscles in adult Royal Dutch sport horses.
Jose-Cunilleras, E; Wijnberg, I D.
Afiliação
  • Jose-Cunilleras E; Servei de Medicina Interna Equina, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary Faculty, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
  • Wijnberg ID; Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Equine Vet J ; 48(2): 234-9, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25588792
ABSTRACT
REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY Reference values for quantitative electromyography (QEMG) in shoulder and hindlimb muscles of horses are limited.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine normative data on QEMG analysis of supraspinatus (SS), infraspinatus (IS), deltoideus (DT) and biceps femoris (BF) muscles. STUDY

DESIGN:

Experimental observational study and retrospective case series.

METHODS:

Seven adult healthy Royal Dutch sport horses underwent quantitative motor unit action potential analysis of each muscle using commercial electromyography equipment. Measurements were made according to published methods. One-way ANOVA was used to compare quantitative motor unit action potential variables between muscles, with post hoc testing according to Bonferroni, with significance set at P<0.05. The QEMG and clinical information from horses with lower motor neuron disorders (n = 7) or myopathy (n = 4) were summarised retrospectively.

RESULTS:

The 95% confidence intervals of duration, amplitude, phases, turns, area and size index of quantitative motor unit action potential were 8.7-10.4 ms, 651-867 µV, 3.2-3.7, 3.7-4.7, 1054-1457 µV·ms and 1.1-1.5 for SS, 9.6-11.0 ms, 779-1082 µV, 3.3-3.7, 3.8-4.7, 1349-2204 µV·ms and 1.4-1.9 for IS, 6.0-9.1 ms, 370-691 µV, 2.9-3.7, 2.8-4.5, 380-1374 µV·ms and 0.3-1.3 for DT and 5.7-7.8 ms, 265-385 µV, 2.7-3.2, 2.6-3.1, 296-484 µV·ms and 0.2-0.5 for BF, respectively. Mean duration, amplitude, number of phases and turns, area and size index were significantly (P<0.01) higher in SS and IS than in DT and BF muscles. In addition, 4 of 7 normal horses had >15% polyphasic motor unit action potentials in SS and IS muscles.

CONCLUSIONS:

Differences between muscles should be taken into account when performing QEMG in order to be able to distinguish normal horses from horses with suspected neurogenic or myogenic disorders. These normal data provide the basis for objective QEMG assessment of shoulder and hindlimb muscles. Quantitative electromyography appears to be helpful in diagnosing neuropathies and discriminating these from myopathies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recrutamento Neurofisiológico / Potenciais de Ação / Músculo Esquelético / Cavalos / Neurônios Motores Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recrutamento Neurofisiológico / Potenciais de Ação / Músculo Esquelético / Cavalos / Neurônios Motores Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article