Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Choosing your partner for the PROM: a review of evidence on patient-reported outcome measures for use in primary and community care.
Bryan, Stirling; Davis, Jennifer; Broesch, James; Doyle-Waters, Mary M; Lewis, Steven; McGrail, Kim; McGregor, Margaret J; Murphy, Janice M; Sawatzky, Rick.
Afiliação
  • Bryan S; Director, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Professor, School of Population & Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
  • Davis J; Post-Doctoral Fellow, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC.
  • Broesch J; Post-Doctoral Fellow, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC.
  • Doyle-Waters MM; Librarian, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC.
  • Lewis S; President, Access Consulting Ltd, Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Saskatoon, SK.
  • McGrail K; Assistant Professor, School of Population & Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Associate Director, Centre for Health Service & Policy Research, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
  • McGregor MJ; Associate, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Associate, Centre for Health Service & Policy Research, The University of British Columbia.
  • Murphy JM; Research Consultant, Balfour, BC; and Rick Sawatzky, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Scientist, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Healthcare, Langley, BC.
Healthc Policy ; 10(2): 38-51, 2014 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25617514
ABSTRACT
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are assessments of health status from the patient's perspective. The systematic and routine collection and use of PROMs in healthcare settings adds value in several ways, including quality improvement and service evaluation. We address the issue of instrument selection for use in primary and/or community settings. Specifically, from the large number of available PROMs, which instrument delivers the highest level of performance and validity? For selected generic PROMs, we reviewed literature on psychometric properties and other instrument features (e.g., health domains captured). Briefly we summarize key strengths of the three PROMs that received the most favourable psycho-metric and overall evaluation. The Short-Form 36 has a number of strengths, chiefly, its strong psychometric properties such as responsiveness. The PROMIS/Global Health Scale scored highly on most criteria and warrants serious consideration, especially as it is free to use. The EQ-5D scored satisfactorily on many criteria and, beneficially, it has a low response burden.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Serviços de Saúde Comunitária / Autorrelato / Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Serviços de Saúde Comunitária / Autorrelato / Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article