Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effects of single-level instrumented lumbar laminectomy on adjacent spinal biomechanics.
Bisschop, Arno; Holewijn, Roderick M; Kingma, Idsart; Stadhouder, Agnita; Vergroesen, Pieter-Paul A; van der Veen, Albert J; van Dieën, Jaap H; van Royen, Barend J.
Afiliação
  • Bisschop A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Holewijn RM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kingma I; Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Stadhouder A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Vergroesen PP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Veen AJ; Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Dieën JH; Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • van Royen BJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute MOVE, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Global Spine J ; 5(1): 39-48, 2015 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25649753
ABSTRACT
Study Design Biomechanical study. Objective Posterior instrumentation is used to stabilize the spine after a lumbar laminectomy. However, the effects on the adjacent segmental stability are unknown. Therefore, we studied the range of motion (ROM) and stiffness of treated lumbar spinal segments and cranial segments after a laminectomy and after posterior instrumentation in flexion and extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). These outcomes might help to better understand adjacent segment disease (ASD), which is reported cranial to the level on which posterior instrumentation is applied. Methods We obtained 12 cadaveric human lumbar spines. Spines were axially loaded with 250 N for 1 hour. Thereafter, 10 consecutive load cycles (4 Nm) were applied in FE, LB, and AR. Subsequently, a laminectomy was performed either at L2 or at L4. Thereafter, load-deformation tests were repeated, after similar preloading. Finally, posterior instrumentation was added to the level treated with a laminectomy before testing was repeated. The ROM and stiffness of the treated, the cranial adjacent, and the control segments were calculated from the load-displacement data. Repeated-measures analyses of variance used the spinal level as the between-subject factor and a laminectomy or instrumentation as the within-subject factors. Results After the laminectomy, the ROM increased (+19.4%) and the stiffness decreased (-18.0%) in AR. The ROM in AR of the adjacent segments also increased (+11.0%). The ROM of treated segments after instrumentation decreased in FE (-74.3%), LB (-71.6%), and AR (-59.8%). In the adjacent segments after instrumentation, only the ROM in LB was changed (-12.9%). Conclusions The present findings do not substantiate a biomechanical pathway toward or explanation for ASD.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article