Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for extra-pulmonary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis.
Penz, E; Boffa, J; Roberts, D J; Fisher, D; Cooper, R; Ronksley, P E; James, M T.
Afiliação
  • Penz E; <sup>*</sup>Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
  • Boffa J; <sup>†</sup>Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary.
  • Roberts DJ; <sup>‡</sup>Departments of Surgery and Community Health Sciences, Intensive Care Unit Administration, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary.
  • Fisher D; <sup>§</sup>Peter Lougheed Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary.
  • Cooper R; <sup>¶</sup>Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta.
  • Ronksley PE; <sup>#</sup>Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario.
  • James MT; <sup>**</sup>Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary and the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 19(3): 278-84, i-iii, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25686134
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Xpert(®) MTB/RIF is a commercially available nucleic acid amplification test developed for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB).

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert for the detection of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB).

METHODS:

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Global Health databases from January 2010 to 15 August 2014 for studies of diagnostic performance in which Xpert was examined against culture for patients with clinically suspected EPTB. Bivariate random effects models were used to provide pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS:

Thirty-six studies were identified, with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of respectively 77% (95%CI 66-85) and 97% (95%CI 94-98). Substantial variations existed between study estimates of sensitivity (I(2) = 99%) and specificity (I(2) = 96%). Among site-specific estimates for lymph, pleural fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, gastro-intestinal and urinary samples, the pooled sensitivity was lower in pleural fluid (37%, 95%CI 26-50, meta-regression P < 0.001) and higher in lymph node samples (87%, 95%CI 75-95, meta-regression P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION:

Xpert has high specificity but limited sensitivity for the detection of EPTB. Although positive Xpert test results may be useful in rapidly identifying EPTB cases, negative test results provide less certainty for ruling out disease.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose Pulmonar / Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose Pulmonar / Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article