Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computerized training system for ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture on abnormal spine models: a randomized controlled trial.
Keri, Zsuzsanna; Sydor, Devin; Ungi, Tamas; Holden, Matthew S; McGraw, Robert; Mousavi, Parvin; Borschneck, Daniel P; Fichtinger, Gabor; Jaeger, Melanie.
Afiliação
  • Keri Z; Laboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, 557 Goodwin Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L2N8, Canada, zsuzsanna.keri@queensu.ca.
Can J Anaesth ; 62(7): 777-84, 2015 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25804431
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

A randomized controlled trial was carried out to determine whether Perk Tutor, a computerized training platform that displays an ultrasound image and real-time needle position in a three-dimensional (3D) anatomical model, would benefit residents learning ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture (LP) in simulation phantoms with abnormal spinal anatomy.

METHODS:

Twenty-four residents were randomly assigned to either the Perk Tutor (P) or the Control (C) group and asked to perform an LP with ultrasound guidance on part-task trainers with spinal pathology. Group P was trained with the 3D display along with conventional ultrasound imaging, while Group C used conventional ultrasound only. Both groups were then tested solely with conventional ultrasound guidance on an abnormal spinal model not previously seen. We measured potential tissue damage, needle path in tissue, total procedure time, and needle insertion time. Procedural success rate was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS:

The needle tracking measurements (expressed as median [interquartile range; IQR]) in Group P vs Group C revealed less potential tissue damage (39.7 [21.3-42.7] cm(2) vs 128.3 [50.3-208.2] cm(2), respectively; difference 88.6; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 24.8 to 193.5; P = 0.01), a shorter needle path inside the tissue (426.0 [164.9-571.6] mm vs 629.7 [306.4-2,879.1] mm, respectively; difference 223.7; 95% CI 76.3 to 1,859.9; P = 0.02), and lower needle insertion time (30.3 [14.0-51.0] sec vs 59.1 [26.0-136.2] sec, respectively; difference 28.8; 95% CI 2.2 to 134.0; P = 0.05). Total procedure time and overall success rates between groups did not differ.

CONCLUSION:

Residents trained with augmented reality 3D visualization had better performance metrics on ultrasound-guided LP in pathological spine models.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Punção Espinal / Coluna Vertebral / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Modelos Anatômicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Punção Espinal / Coluna Vertebral / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Modelos Anatômicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article