Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Costs of using "tiny targets" to control Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, a vector of gambiense sleeping sickness in Arua District of Uganda.
Shaw, Alexandra P M; Tirados, Inaki; Mangwiro, Clement T N; Esterhuizen, Johan; Lehane, Michael J; Torr, Stephen J; Kovacic, Vanja.
Afiliação
  • Shaw AP; Division of Pathway Medicine and Centre for Infectious Diseases, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; AP Consultants, Walworth Business Park, Andover, United Kingdom.
  • Tirados I; Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Mangwiro CT; Bindura University of Science Education, Department of Animal Science, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
  • Esterhuizen J; Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Lehane MJ; Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Torr SJ; Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
  • Kovacic V; Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 9(3): e0003624, 2015 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25811956
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To evaluate the relative effectiveness of tsetse control methods, their costs need to be analysed alongside their impact on tsetse populations. Very little has been published on the costs of methods specifically targeting human African trypanosomiasis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

FINDINGS:

In northern Uganda, a 250 km2 field trial was undertaken using small (0.5 X 0.25 m) insecticide-treated targets ("tiny targets"). Detailed cost recording accompanied every phase of the work. Costs were calculated for this operation as if managed by the Ugandan vector control services removing purely research components of the work and applying local salaries. This calculation assumed that all resources are fully used, with no spare capacity. The full cost of the operation was assessed at USD 85.4 per km2, of which USD 55.7 or 65.2% were field costs, made up of three component activities (target deployment 34.5%, trap monitoring 10.6% and target maintenance 20.1%). The remaining USD 29.7 or 34.8% of the costs were for preliminary studies and administration (tsetse surveys 6.0%, sensitisation of local populations 18.6% and office support 10.2%). Targets accounted for only 12.9% of the total cost, other important cost components were labour (24.1%) and transport (34.6%).

DISCUSSION:

Comparison with the updated cost of historical HAT vector control projects and recent estimates indicates that this work represents a major reduction in cost levels. This is attributed not just to the low unit cost of tiny targets but also to the organisation of delivery, using local labour with bicycles or motorcycles. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken, investigating key prices and assumptions. It is believed that these costs are generalizable to other HAT foci, although in more remote areas, with denser vegetation and fewer people, costs would increase, as would be the case for other tsetse control techniques.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tripanossomíase Africana / Controle de Insetos / Inseticidas Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tripanossomíase Africana / Controle de Insetos / Inseticidas Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Animals / Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article