Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Mohamed Kamal, Rasha; Hussien Helal, Maha; Wessam, Rasha; Mahmoud Mansour, Sahar; Godda, Iman; Alieldin, Nelly.
Afiliação
  • Mohamed Kamal R; Radiology Department (Women's Imaging unit), Kasr ElAiny Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Hussien Helal M; Radiology Department (Breast Imaging unit), National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Wessam R; Radiology Department (Women's Imaging unit), Kasr ElAiny Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Mahmoud Mansour S; Radiology Department (Breast Imaging unit), National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt. Electronic address: sahar_mnsr@yahoo.com.
  • Godda I; Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • Alieldin N; Statistics Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
Eur J Radiol ; 84(6): 1049-55, 2015 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25818731
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and to assess their impact on the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND

METHOD:

This ethics committee approved study included 168 consecutive patients with 211 breast lesions over 18 months. Lesions classified as non-enhancing and enhancing and then the latter group was subdivided into mass and non-mass. Mass lesions descriptors included shape, margins, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. Non-mass lesions descriptors included distribution, pattern and degree of internal enhancement. The impact of each descriptor on diagnosis individually assessed using Chi test and the validity compared in both benign and malignant lesions. The overall performance of CESM were also calculated.

RESULTS:

The study included 102 benign (48.3%) and 109 malignant (51.7%) lesions. Enhancement was encountered in 145/211 (68.7%) lesions. They further classified into enhancing mass (99/145, 68.3%) and non-mass lesions (46/145, 31.7%). Contrast uptake was significantly more frequent in malignant breast lesions (p value ≤ 0.001). Irregular mass lesions with intense and heterogeneous enhancement patterns correlated with a malignant pathology (p value ≤ 0.001). CESM showed an overall sensitivity of 88.99% and specificity of 83.33%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.34 and 0.13 respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The assessment of the morphology and enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on CESM enhances the performance of digital mammography in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article