Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Herbal medicines and chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): A critical literature review.
Schloss, Janet; Colosimo, Maree; Vitetta, Luis.
Afiliação
  • Schloss J; a The University of Queensland, The School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, Princess Alexandra Hospital , Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba , Australia.
  • Colosimo M; b Medical Oncology Group of Australia, Queensland Clinical Oncology Group , Chermside , Australia.
  • Vitetta L; c The University of Sydney, The School of Medicine , Sydney Australia.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 57(6): 1107-1118, 2017 Apr 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25849070
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy [CIPN] is a common significant and debilitating side-effect resulting from the administration of neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. These pharmaco-chemotherapeutics can include taxanes, vinca alkaloids, platinum analogues, and others. Moderate to severe CIPN significantly decreases the quality of life and physical abilities of cancer patients and current pharmacotherapy for CIPN e.g. Amifostine, and antidepressants have had limited efficacy and may themselves induce adverse side-effects.

METHODS:

To determine the potential use of herbal medicines as adjuvants in cancer treatments, a critical literature review was conducted by electronic and manual search on nine databases. These include PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and two Chinese databases CNKI and CINAHL. Thirty-four studies were selected from 5614 studies assessed and comprising animal studies, case reports, retrospective studies, and minimal randomized clinical trials investigating the anti-CIPN effect of herbal medicines as the adjuvant intervention in patients administered chemotherapy. The thirty-four studies were assessed on methodological quality and limitations identified.

RESULTS:

Studies were mixed in their recommendations for herbal medicines as an adjuvant treatment for CIPN.

CONCLUSION:

Currently no agent has shown solid beneficial evidence to be recommended for the treatment or prophylaxis of CIPN. Given that the number of cancer survivors is increasing, the long-term side effects of cancer treatment, is of major importance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico / Preparações de Plantas / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico / Preparações de Plantas / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article