Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT.
Kauv, Paul; Benadjaoud, Samir; Curis, Emmanuel; Boulay-Coletta, Isabelle; Loriau, Jerome; Zins, Marc.
Afiliação
  • Kauv P; Department of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Benadjaoud S; Department of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Curis E; Laboratoire de biomathématiques, Faculté de pharmacie, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75006, Paris, France.
  • Boulay-Coletta I; Department of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Loriau J; Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Zins M; Department of Radiology, Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France. mzins@hpsj.fr.
Eur Radiol ; 25(12): 3543-51, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25925357
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in postoperative colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL).

METHODS:

Two independent blinded radiologists reviewed 153 CTs performed for suspected AL within 60 days after surgery in 131 consecutive patients, with (n = 58) or without (n = 95) retrograde contrast enema (RCE). Results were compared to original interpretations. The reference standard was reoperation or consensus (a radiologist and a surgeon) regarding clinical, laboratory, radiological, and follow-up data after medical treatment.

RESULTS:

AL was confirmed in 34/131 patients. For the two reviewers and original interpretation, sensitivity of CT was 82 %, 87 %, and 71 %, respectively; specificity was 84 %, 84 %, and 92 %. RCE significantly increased the positive predictive value (from 40 % to 88 %, P = 0.0009; 41 % to 92 %, P = 0.0016; and 40 % to 100 %, P = 0.0006). Contrast extravasation was the most sensitive (reviewers, 83 % and 83 %) and specific (97 % and 97 %) sign and was significantly associated with AL by univariate analysis (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis with recursive partitioning, CT with RCE was accurate to confirm or rule out AL with contrast extravasation.

CONCLUSIONS:

CT with RCE is accurate for diagnosing postoperative colorectal AL. Contrast extravasation is the most reliable sign. RCE should be performed during CT for suspected AL. KEY POINTS • CT accurately diagnosed clinically suspected colorectal AL and showed good interobserver agreement • Contrast extravasation was the most sensitive and specific CT sign • Retrograde contrast enema during CT improved positive predictive value • Retrograde contrast enema decreased false-negative or indeterminate original CT interpretations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Cirurgia Colorretal / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Cirurgia Colorretal / Fístula Anastomótica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article