Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Necessity to develop a tool to evaluate activity of daily living for electric powered indoor/outdoor chair users.
Lee, Jiwon; Lim, Jae Kuk; Lee, Min Jun; Jo, Yoon-Sik; Park, Jae Sung; Kim, Jong Moon; Kim, Shin Kyoung.
Afiliação
  • Lee J; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
  • Lim JK; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
  • Lee MJ; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
  • Jo YS; Department of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
  • Park JS; Department of Neurosurgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
  • Kim JM; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
  • Kim SK; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
Ann Rehabil Med ; 39(2): 277-84, 2015 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25932425
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate changes in activity of daily living before and after provision of electric-powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC), discuss problems of current activities of daily living (ADL) evaluating tools for EPIOC users, and provide preliminary data to develop ADL evaluation tool for EPIOC user.

METHODS:

A total of 70 users who were prescribed EPIOC and had been using for more than 1 year were recruited in this study. Before and after provision of EPIOC, MBI and FIM scores were measured and a questionnaire consisting of six categories (general socioeconomic states, currently using state, whether EPIOC was helpful for social participation and occupational chances, psychiatric influences, self-reported degrees of independency, and barriers of using EPIOC) was used.

RESULTS:

No difference in MBI scores before and after provision of EPIOC was observed. However, the wheelchair ambulation category showed a significant difference. While motor FIM was not significantly different from MBI, FIM score were significantly (p<0.05) higher than MBI. For questions regarding social participation frequency, helpfulness of EPIOC on confidence, refreshing patients' emotions and self-reported degrees of independence, all of them showed positive responses. Especially, EPIOC users' self-reported degree of independency showed favorable results. There was discrepancy in MBI or FIM measured by physicians.

CONCLUSION:

Our study showed that there was a gap between the existing ADL evaluation tool and the ADL level that EPIOC users were actually feeling. Thus, it is necessary to develop an evaluation tool specifically for EPIOC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article