Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of the SA-VA Difference to Differentiate Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia from Orthodromic Reentrant Tachycardia in a Large Cohort of Consecutive Patients.
Akerström, Finn; Pachón, Marta; García-Fernández, Francisco Javier; Puchol, Alberto; Salgado, Ricardo; Rodríguez-Padial, Luis; Arias, Miguel A.
Afiliação
  • Akerström F; Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
  • Pachón M; Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
  • García-Fernández FJ; Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
  • Puchol A; Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
  • Salgado R; Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
  • Rodríguez-Padial L; Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
  • Arias MA; Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 38(9): 1066-72, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26095973
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The stimulus-atrial (SA) interval minus ventriculoatrial (VA) interval (SA-VA) difference represents a simple diagnostic maneuver to distinguish between atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic reentrant tachycardia (ORT) during electrophysiology study. However, its usefulness has largely been studied in selected patient subgroups. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the SA-VA difference against commonly used diagnostic maneuvers in a large cohort of consecutive patients.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients with inducible supraventricular tachycardia and successful entrainment through pacing trains from right ventricular apex during an electrophysiological study were included. Atrial tachycardias were excluded. The following intervals were calculated for each patient SA-VA difference, His potential, and atrial electrogram during entrainment minus His potential and atrial electrogram during tachycardia, and the corrected return cycle.

RESULTS:

A total of 456 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which electrophysiological study revealed 265 typical AVNRT, 38 atypical AVNRT, and 54 and 108 ORT through a septal and free-wall accessory pathway, respectively. An SA-VA difference >99 ms identified AVNRT in all patients with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 97.7%, 96.9%, 98.3%, and 95.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study confirms the high ability to distinguish AVNRT from ORT using the SA-VA difference, not only in selected patient subgroups, but as whole when a cut-off of >99 ms is used.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular / Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas / Taquicardia Reciprocante / Feixe Acessório Atrioventricular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular / Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas / Taquicardia Reciprocante / Feixe Acessório Atrioventricular Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article