Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experimental left pneumonectomy in pigs: procedure and management.
Bufalari, Antonello; De Monte, Valentina; Pecoriello, Roberta; Donati, Livia; Ceccarelli, Silvia; Cagini, Lucio; Ragusa, Mark; Vannucci, Jacopo.
Afiliação
  • Bufalari A; Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • De Monte V; Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Pecoriello R; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Perugia Medical School, Perugia, Italy.
  • Donati L; Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Ceccarelli S; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Perugia Medical School, Perugia, Italy.
  • Cagini L; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Perugia Medical School, Perugia, Italy.
  • Ragusa M; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Perugia Medical School, Perugia, Italy.
  • Vannucci J; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Perugia Medical School, Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: jacopovannucci@tiscali.it.
J Surg Res ; 198(1): 208-16, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26115805
BACKGROUND: Because there is no detailed description of procedures and perioperative management of major pulmonary resections in swine, we reviewed our experience to delineate the most effective practice in performing left pneumonectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of 11 consecutive left pneumonectomies. Animal data, operative reports, anesthesia records, and perioperative facts were evaluated. Follow-up information until postoperative day 60, methods of care-taking, therapy administration, and all the stabling aspects were systematically assessed. The investigation was aimed at highlighting those procedural steps or details which make the difference in optimizing the available resources (animals, instruments, and personnel). No statistical analysis was performed considering data characteristics and the descriptive nature of information. RESULTS: Surgery requires a median time of 2 h and 16 min; two operators and one anesthesiologist represent the basic team. Circulators' number depends on goals to accomplish. The most straightforward procedure requires careful dissection of the pulmonary ligament (limited view), pulmonary veins (low variability), pulmonary artery (delicate), and finally bronchus (no variability observed). The key factors for good anesthesia management have been identified: sedation by caregivers, preoxygenation before induction of general anesthesia, high respiratory rates with low tidal volume after pneumonectomy, and noninvasive ventilation after extubation. Antibiotic prophylaxis has been performed. Postoperative care must be continuous until animals are able to stand up, afterward "preventive noncurative," and always animal friendly. Ideas for minimally stressful therapy administration are helpful. CONCLUSIONS: After the delineation of this methodology, the compliance to a routine practice allowed us to reduce time, stress, and cost; quality and quantity of possible research increased.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonectomia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumonectomia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article