Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of lipegfilgrastim in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving myelosuppressive therapy.
Volovat, Constantin; Bondarenko, Igor M; Gladkov, Oleg A; Elsässer, Reiner; Buchner, Anton; Bias, Peter; Müller, Udo.
Afiliação
  • Volovat C; Centrul de Oncologie Medicala, Vasile Conta 2 Str, 700106 Iasi, Romania.
  • Bondarenko IM; Dnipropetrovsk State Medical Academy, City Clinical Hospital, N 4, 31, Glizhnaya Str, Dnipropetrovsk, 49102 Ukraine.
  • Gladkov OA; Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, 42, Blukhera Str., Chelyabinsk, 454087 Russia.
  • Elsässer R; Teva Ratiopharm, Merckle GmbH, Graf-Arco-Strasse 3, 89079 Ulm, Germany.
  • Buchner A; Teva Ratiopharm, Merckle GmbH, Graf-Arco-Strasse 3, 89079 Ulm, Germany.
  • Bias P; Teva Ratiopharm, Merckle GmbH, Graf-Arco-Strasse 3, 89079 Ulm, Germany.
  • Müller U; Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Graf-Arco-Strasse 3, 89079 Ulm, Germany.
Springerplus ; 4: 316, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26155455
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study was to demonstrate lipegfilgrastim superiority versus placebo in adults with non-small cell lung cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

METHODS:

This phase III, double-blind study randomized chemotherapy-naive patients to receive cisplatin and etoposide with either lipegfilgrastim 6 mg or placebo. Because of the placebo control, patients at individual high risk for febrile neutropenia (FN; ≥20%) were excluded. Study drug was administered on day 4 (24 h after chemotherapy) of a 21-day cycle for ≤4 cycles. Primary efficacy measure was FN incidence in cycle 1. Secondary assessments included duration of severe neutropenia (DSN), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) profile, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS:

The study included 375 patients (lipegfilgrastim, n = 250; placebo, n = 125). Lipegfilgrastim superiority for FN incidence in cycle 1 was not achieved but incidence was lower (2.4%) versus placebo (5.6%). Cycle 1 mean DSN was significantly shorter for lipegfilgrastim (0.6 ± 1.1 days) versus placebo (2.3 ± 0.5 days; p < 0.0001). Incidence of severe neutropenia was significantly lower for lipegfilgrastim versus placebo overall and in each cycle (all, p < 0.0001). Mean ANC nadir was lowest in cycle 1 but significantly higher for lipegfilgrastim (1.60 ± 1.64) than placebo (0.67 ± 0.85; p < 0.0001). Mean time to ANC recovery was shorter with lipegfilgrastim in each cycle. Treatment-emergent AEs were similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Lipegfilgrastim was not statistically superior to placebo for incidence of FN in cycle 1, but was more effective in reducing incidence of severe neutropenia, DSN, and time to ANC recovery, with an acceptable safety profile. Controlled-trials.com identifier ISRCTN55761467.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article