Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Benefits of High Relaxivity for Brain Tumor Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine with Gadoterate Meglumine (The BENEFIT Study).
Vaneckova, M; Herman, M; Smith, M P; Mechl, M; Maravilla, K R; Weichet, J; Spampinato, M V; Zizka, J; Wippold, F J; Baima, J J; Babbel, R; Bültmann, E; Huang, R Y; Buhk, J-H; Bonafé, A; Colosimo, C; Lui, S; Kirchin, M A; Shen, N; Pirovano, G; Spinazzi, A.
Afiliação
  • Vaneckova M; From the Charles University in Prague (M.V.), First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic man.van@post.cz.
  • Herman M; University Hospital Olomouc (M.H.), Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Smith MP; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (M.P.S.), Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Mechl M; Faculty of Medicine (M.M.), University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Maravilla KR; MR Research Laboratory (K.R.M.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Weichet J; Na Homolce Hospital (J.W.), Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Spampinato MV; Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (M.V.S.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Zizka J; University Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové (J.Z.), University Hospital Hradec Králové and Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Wippold FJ; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (F.J.W.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Baima JJ; Clinical Radiologists, S.C. (J.J.B.), Springfield, Illinois.
  • Babbel R; Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center (R.B.), Corvallis, Oregon.
  • Bültmann E; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (E.B.), Hannover, Germany.
  • Huang RY; Harvard Medical School (R.Y.H.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Buhk JH; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf (J.-H.B.), Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bonafé A; Hopital Gui de Chauliac (A.B.), Montpellier, France.
  • Colosimo C; Policlinico "Agostino Gemelli" (C.C.), Rome, Italy.
  • Lui S; West China Hospital of Sichuan University (S.L.), Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Kirchin MA; Global Medical & Regulatory Affairs (M.A.K.), Bracco Imaging S.p.A., Milan, Italy.
  • Shen N; Global Medical & Regulatory Affairs (N.S., G.P., A.S.), Bracco Diagnostics, Monroe, New Jersey.
  • Pirovano G; Global Medical & Regulatory Affairs (N.S., G.P., A.S.), Bracco Diagnostics, Monroe, New Jersey.
  • Spinazzi A; Global Medical & Regulatory Affairs (N.S., G.P., A.S.), Bracco Diagnostics, Monroe, New Jersey.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 36(9): 1589-98, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26185325
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) has higher r1 relaxivity than gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem) which may permit the use of lower doses for MR imaging applications. Our aim was to compare 0.1- and 0.05-mmol/kg body weight gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg body weight gadoterate for MR imaging assessment of brain tumors. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We performed crossover, intraindividual comparison of 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate (Arm 1) and 0.05-mmol/kg gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate (Arm 2). Adult patients with suspected or known brain tumors were randomized to Arm 1 (70 patients) or Arm 2 (107 patients) and underwent 2 identical examinations at 1.5 T. The agents were injected in randomized-sequence order, and the 2 examinations were separated by 2-14 days. MR imaging scanners, imaging sequences (T1-weighted spin-echo and T1-weighted high-resolution gradient-echo), and acquisition timing were identical for the 2 examinations. Three blinded readers evaluated images for diagnostic information (degree of definition of lesion extent, lesion border delineation, visualization of lesion internal morphology, contrast enhancement) and quantitatively for percentage lesion enhancement and lesion-to-background ratio. Safety assessments were performed.

RESULTS:

In Arm 1, a highly significant superiority (P < .002) of 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate was demonstrated by all readers for all end points. In Arm 2, no significant differences (P > .1) were observed for any reader and any end point, with the exception of percentage enhancement for reader 2 (P < .05) in favor of 0.05-mmol/kg gadobenate. Study agent-related adverse events were reported by 2/169 (1.2%) patients after gadobenate and by 5/175 (2.9%) patients after gadoterate.

CONCLUSIONS:

Significantly superior morphologic information and contrast enhancement are demonstrated on brain MR imaging with 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate compared with 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate. No meaningful differences were recorded between 0.05-mmol/kg gadobenate and 0.1-mmol/kg gadoterate.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article