Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
Santin, Gabriela Cristina; Palma-Dibb, Regina Guenka; Romano, Fábio Lourenço; de Oliveira, Harley Francisco; Nelson Filho, Paulo; de Queiroz, Alexandra Mussolino.
Afiliação
  • Santin GC; Postgraduate student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: gabsantin@usp.br.
  • Palma-Dibb RG; Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Romano FL; Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Oliveira HF; Professor, Department of Medical Clinics, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Nelson Filho P; Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Queiroz AM; Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 148(2): 283-92, 2015 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26232837
INTRODUCTION: The increasing success rates for cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and the frequent occurrence of tooth loss during treatment have led to an increased demand for orthodontic treatment after radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate tooth enamel of irradiated teeth after the bonding and debonding of metal and ceramic brackets. METHODS: Ten permanent molars were cut into enamel fragments measuring 1 mm(2) and divided into an irradiated group (total dose of 60 Gy) and a nonirradiated group. The fragments were subjected to microshear testing to evaluate whether radiotherapy altered the strength of the enamel. Furthermore, 90 prepared premolars were divided into 6 groups and subgroups (n = 15): group 1, nonirradiated and nonaged; group 2, nonirradiated and aged (thermal cycled); group 3, irradiated and aged; each group was divided into 2 subgroups: metallic and ceramic brackets. After thermal cycling and radiotherapy, the brackets were bonded onto the specimens with Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). After 24 hours, the specimens were subjected to the shear tests. Images of the enamel surfaces were classified using the adhesive remnant index. The composite resin-enamel interface was also evaluated. RESULTS: Enamel fragments subjected to radiation had lower strength than did the nonirradiated samples (P <0.05). The groups and subgroups submitted to radiation and bonded ceramic brackets had the lowest strength values. Groups 1 and 2 with metallic brackets had less adhesive on the surface, whereas groups 1 and 2 with ceramic brackets and group 3 with both metallic and ceramic brackets had more adhesive on the surfaces. On the images of the composite resin-enamel interface, resin tags were more extensive on irradiated tooth enamel. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation decreased tooth enamel strength, and the specimens treated with radiotherapy had higher frequencies of adhesive failure between the bracket and the composite resin as well as more extensive tags.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dosagem Radioterapêutica / Cerâmica / Colagem Dentária / Braquetes Ortodônticos / Ligas Dentárias / Esmalte Dentário / Materiais Dentários Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dosagem Radioterapêutica / Cerâmica / Colagem Dentária / Braquetes Ortodônticos / Ligas Dentárias / Esmalte Dentário / Materiais Dentários Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article