Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterization of large surface area polymer monoliths and their utility for rapid, selective solid phase extraction for improved sample clean up.
Candish, Esme; Wirth, Hans-Jürgen; Gooley, Andrew A; Shellie, Robert A; Hilder, Emily F.
Afiliação
  • Candish E; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, School of Physical Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; Trajan Scientific & Medical, 7 Argent Place Ringwood, Victoria 3134, Australia.
  • Wirth HJ; Trajan Scientific & Medical, 7 Argent Place Ringwood, Victoria 3134, Australia.
  • Gooley AA; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, School of Physical Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; Trajan Scientific & Medical, 7 Argent Place Ringwood, Victoria 3134, Australia.
  • Shellie RA; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, School of Physical Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
  • Hilder EF; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science, School of Physical Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. Electronic address: Emily.Hilder@utas.edu.au.
J Chromatogr A ; 1410: 9-18, 2015 Sep 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26233256
ABSTRACT
While polymer monoliths are widely described for solid phase extraction (SPE), appropriate characterization is rarely provided to unravel the links between physical characteristics and observed advantages and disadvantages. Two known approaches to fabricate large surface area polymer monoliths with a bimodal pore structure were investigated. The first incorporated a high percentage of divinyl benzene (PDVB) and the second explored hypercrosslinking of pre-formed monoliths. Adsorption of probe analytes; anisole, benzoic acid, cinnamic acid, ibuprofen and cortisone were investigated using frontal analysis and the SPE performance was compared with particulate adsorbents. Frontal analysis of anisole described maximum adsorption capacities of 164mgg(-1) and 298mgg(-1) for hypercrosslinked and PDVB adsorbents, respectively. The solvated state specific surface area was calculated to be 341 and 518m(2)g(-1) respectively. BET revealed a hypercrosslinked surface area of 817m(2)g(-1), 2.5 times greater than in the solvated state. The PDVB BET surface area was 531m(2)g(-1), similar to the solvated state. Micropores of 1nm provided the enhanced surface area for hypercrosslinked adsorbents. PDVB displayed a pore size distribution of 1-6nm. Frontal analysis demonstrated the micropores present size exclusion for the larger probes. Recovery of anisole was determined by SPE using 0.4 and 1.0mLmin(-1). Recovery for PDVB remained constant at 90%±0.103 regardless of the extraction flow rate suggesting extraction performance is independent of flow rate. A more efficient sample purification of saccharin in urine was yielded by PDVB due to selective permeation of the small pores.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poliestirenos / Extração em Fase Sólida Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poliestirenos / Extração em Fase Sólida Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article