Locoregional tumour evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck area: a comparison between MRI, PET/CT and integrated PET/MRI.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
; 43(1): 92-102, 2016 Jan.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26243264
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To evaluate the accuracy of integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging for locoregional tumour evaluation compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging in initial tumour and recurrence diagnosis in histopathologically confirmed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).METHODS:
(18)F-FDG PET/CT and integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging were performed for initial tumour staging or recurrence diagnosis in 25 patients with HNSCC. MR, fused (18)F-FDG PET/CT and fused (18)F-FDG PET/MR images were analysed by two independent readers in separate sessions in random order. In initial tumour staging, T and N staging was performed while individual lesions were analysed in patients with suspected cancer recurrence. In T and N staging, histopathological results after tumour resection served as the reference standard while histopathological sampling as well as cross-sectional and clinical follow-up were accepted in cancer recurrence diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy of each modality was calculated separately for T and N staging as well as for tumour recurrence, and compared using McNemar's test. Values of p <0.017 were considered statistically significant after Bonferroni correction.RESULTS:
In 12 patients undergoing (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MR for initial tumour staging, T staging was accurate in 50 % with MRI, in 59 % with PET/CT and in 75 % with PET/MR while N staging was accurate in 75 % with MRI, in 77 % with PET/CT and in 71 % with PET/MR in relation to the reference standard. No significant differences were observed in T and N staging among the three modalities (p > 0.017). In 13 patients undergoing hybrid imaging for cancer recurrence diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy was 57 % with MRI and in 72 % with (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MR, respectively. Again, no significant differences were found among the three modalities (p > 0.017).CONCLUSION:
In this initial study, no significant differences were found among (18)F-FDG PET/MR, (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in local tumour staging and cancer recurrence diagnosis.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
/
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas
/
Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
/
Fluordesoxiglucose F18
/
Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons
/
Imagem Multimodal
/
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
Limite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2016
Tipo de documento:
Article