Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An in vitro human skin test for assessing sensitization potential.
Ahmed, S S; Wang, X N; Fielding, M; Kerry, A; Dickinson, I; Munuswamy, R; Kimber, I; Dickinson, A M.
Afiliação
  • Ahmed SS; Alcyomics Ltd, Bulman House, Regent Centre, Gosforth, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE3 3LS, UK.
  • Wang XN; Haematological Sciences, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
  • Fielding M; Haematological Sciences, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
  • Kerry A; Haematological Sciences, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
  • Dickinson I; Haematological Sciences, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
  • Munuswamy R; Haematological Sciences, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
  • Kimber I; Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Dickinson AM; Alcyomics Ltd, Bulman House, Regent Centre, Gosforth, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE3 3LS, UK.
J Appl Toxicol ; 36(5): 669-84, 2016 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26251951
ABSTRACT
Sensitization to chemicals resulting in an allergy is an important health issue. The current gold-standard method for identification and characterization of skin-sensitizing chemicals was the mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA). However, for a number of reasons there has been an increasing imperative to develop alternative approaches to hazard identification that do not require the use of animals. Here we describe a human in-vitro skin explant test for identification of sensitization hazards and the assessment of relative skin sensitizing potency. This method measures histological damage in human skin as a readout of the immune response induced by the test material. Using this approach we have measured responses to 44 chemicals including skin sensitizers, pre/pro-haptens, respiratory sensitizers, non-sensitizing chemicals (including skin-irritants) and previously misclassified compounds. Based on comparisons with the LLNA, the skin explant test gave 95% specificity, 95% sensitivity, 95% concordance with a correlation coefficient of 0.9. The same specificity and sensitivity were achieved for comparison of results with published human sensitization data with a correlation coefficient of 0.91. The test also successfully identified nickel sulphate as a human skin sensitizer, which was misclassified as negative in the LLNA. In addition, sensitizers and non-sensitizers identified as positive or negative by the skin explant test have induced high/low T cell proliferation and IFNγ production, respectively. Collectively, the data suggests the human in-vitro skin explant test could provide the basis for a novel approach for characterization of the sensitizing activity as a first step in the risk assessment process.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Cutâneos / Alérgenos / Ensaio Local de Linfonodo / Haptenos / Irritantes / Alternativas aos Testes com Animais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Cutâneos / Alérgenos / Ensaio Local de Linfonodo / Haptenos / Irritantes / Alternativas aos Testes com Animais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article