Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk index for pelvic organ prolapse based on established individual risk factors.
Mothes, A R; Radosa, M P; Altendorf-Hofmann, A; Runnebaum, I B.
Afiliação
  • Mothes AR; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany. anke.mothes@med.uni-jena.de.
  • Radosa MP; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany.
  • Altendorf-Hofmann A; Department of General, Visceral, and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Runnebaum IB; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Bachstraße 18, 07743, Jena, Germany. ingo.runnebaum@med.uni-jena.de.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 293(3): 617-24, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26306984
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To identify known risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in a hospital cohort and to develop a prolapse risk index (PRI).

METHODS:

Risk factors for POP were recorded in women who underwent surgery with symptomatic POP (n = 500) or non-POP gynaecological conditions (n = 236). Descriptive statistics were determined by Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis was performed for all patients and subgroups by age (<60 and ≥60 years). Primary outcome measures were variables with the strongest impact on prolapse and PRI development. Secondary specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), and Cohen's kappa statistic (κ).

RESULTS:

Stepwise multivariate regression analysis (n = 736) showed difficult obstetric history [odds ratio (OR) 10.04], family history of POP (OR 7.28), and ≥10 years since menopause (OR 4.53) were independent risk factors for prolapse (P < 0.001). When one of the three variables with the strongest influence on POP development was present, the PRI for all women showed a PPV of 82%, NPV of 68%, and κ of 0.47 for predicting symptomatic POP requiring treatment. In women under 60 years (n = 349), logistic regression revealed difficult obstetric history (OR 9.108), positive family history (OR 8.016), and body mass index (OR 2.274) as independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Eighty-seven percent of our patient cohort with symptomatic POP requiring therapy could be identified by the PRI, which may be useful for counselling and education.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inquéritos e Questionários / Indicadores Básicos de Saúde / Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inquéritos e Questionários / Indicadores Básicos de Saúde / Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article