Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multiplanar Reformations in the Measurement of Renal Length on CT: Is It Plain Which Plane to Use?
Lisanti, Christopher J; Oettel, David J; Reiter, Michael J; Schwope, Ryan B.
Afiliação
  • Lisanti CJ; 1 Department of Radiology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Dr, #3600, San Antonio, TX 78234.
  • Oettel DJ; 2 Department of Radiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
  • Reiter MJ; 1 Department of Radiology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Dr, #3600, San Antonio, TX 78234.
  • Schwope RB; 3 Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 205(4): 797-801, 2015 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26397327
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of renal measurement on CT in multiple imaging planes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this study, three board-certified radiologists retrospectively measured 110 kidneys on CT in 55 consecutive patients. Five measurement methods were used axial, coronal single image, coronal multiimage, sagittal single image, and sagittal multiimage. The coronal database was sent to a postprocessing workstation, and each radiologist performed a maximum renal measurement using a best off-axis plane that was our reference standard. An ANOVA test with repeated measures and posthoc Bonferroni corrected t tests were performed.

RESULTS:

The mean differences (± standard error) compared with the reference standard method were as follows axial, 7.7 ± 0.7 mm; coronal single image, 13.1 ± 1.4 mm; coronal multiimage, 6.4 ± 0.8 mm; sagittal single image, 6.4 ± 0.6 mm; and sagittal multiimage, 2.8 ± 0.3 mm. The reference standard measurement was larger (p < 0.001), whereas the coronal single-image measurement (p ≤ 0.006) was smaller than all other methods. The sagittal multiimage (p ≤ 0.005) was statistically significantly different from all other methods. There were no statistically significant differences among the axial, coronal multiimage, and sagittal single-image methods (p ≥ 0.088).

CONCLUSION:

The single-image coronal method is the least accurate, with an error of approximately 13 mm. The axial, multiimage coronal, and single-image sagittal methods underestimate renal size by approximately 6-8 mm. Multiimage sagittal is the most accurate method for measuring kidneys with an error of approximately 3 mm.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Rim Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Rim Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article