Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reducing Sun Exposure for Prevention of Skin Cancers: Factorial Invariance and Reliability of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Sun Protection.
Babbin, Steven F; Yin, Hui-Qing; Rossi, Joseph S; Redding, Colleen A; Paiva, Andrea L; Velicer, Wayne F.
Afiliação
  • Babbin SF; Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.
  • Yin HQ; Cancer Prevention Research Center and Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
  • Rossi JS; Cancer Prevention Research Center and Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
  • Redding CA; Cancer Prevention Research Center and Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
  • Paiva AL; Cancer Prevention Research Center and Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
  • Velicer WF; Cancer Prevention Research Center and Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
J Skin Cancer ; 2015: 862732, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26457203
ABSTRACT
The Self-Efficacy Scale for Sun Protection consists of two correlated factors with three items each for Sunscreen Use and Avoidance. This study evaluated two crucial psychometric assumptions, factorial invariance and scale reliability, with a sample of adults (N = 1356) participating in a computer-tailored, population-based intervention study. A measure has factorial invariance when the model is the same across subgroups. Three levels of invariance were tested, from least to most restrictive (1) Configural Invariance (nonzero factor loadings unconstrained); (2) Pattern Identity Invariance (equal factor loadings); and (3) Strong Factorial Invariance (equal factor loadings and measurement errors). Strong Factorial Invariance was a good fit for the model across seven grouping variables age, education, ethnicity, gender, race, skin tone, and Stage of Change for Sun Protection. Internal consistency coefficient Alpha and factor rho scale reliability, respectively, were .84 and .86 for Sunscreen Use, .68 and .70 for Avoidance, and .78 and .78 for the global (total) scale. The psychometric evidence demonstrates strong empirical support that the scale is consistent, has internal validity, and can be used to assess population-based adult samples.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article