Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of two mouthwashes on 3-day supragingival plaque regrowth: a randomized crossover clinical trial.
Marchetti, E; Casalena, F; Capestro, A; Tecco, S; Mattei, A; Marzo, G.
Afiliação
  • Marchetti E; Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Casalena F; Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Capestro A; Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Tecco S; Research Area in Dentofacial Orthopedics, Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Mattei A; Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
  • Marzo G; Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Int J Dent Hyg ; 15(1): 73-80, 2017 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26522915
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the antiplaque effects of an alcohol-free essential oil (alcohol-free EO) mouthwash and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride with zinc lactate (SnFl-Zn) mouthwash compared to a positive control of chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash, using an in vivo plaque regrowth model of 3 days. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The study was designed as a double-masked, randomized, crossover clinical trial, involving 20 volunteers to compare two different mouthwashes, using a 3-day plaque accumulation model. After receiving thorough professional prophylaxis at baseline, over the next 3 days, each volunteer refrained from all oral hygiene measures and performed two daily rinses with 20 ml of the test mouthwashes. A 0.20% CHX rinse served as a positive control. At the end of each experimental period, plaque was assessed, and the panellists completed a questionnaire. Each subject underwent a 14-day washout period, and then, there was another allocation.

RESULTS:

The SnFl-Zn mouthwash has shown a better inhibitory activity on plaque regrowth compared to the alcohol-free EO mouthwash in the whole mouth (plaque index = 1.93 against 2.45, respectively), but there was less of an effect compared to the CHX group, with an overall plaque index of 1.41. The differences of 0.52 between alcohol-free EO and SnFl-Zn and between SnFl-Zn and CHX and of 0.96 between alcohol-free EO and CHX were all statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The alcohol-free EO mouthwash seemed to have less of an inhibiting effect on plaque regrowth than the amine fluoride/SnFl-Zn mouthwash and the CHX control.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Placa Dentária / Antissépticos Bucais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Placa Dentária / Antissépticos Bucais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article