Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maximum upper esophageal sphincter (UES) admittance: a non-specific marker of UES dysfunction.
Cock, C; Besanko, L; Kritas, S; Burgstad, C M; Thompson, A; Heddle, R; Fraser, R J L; Omari, T I.
Afiliação
  • Cock C; Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Besanko L; School of Medicine, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Kritas S; Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Burgstad CM; Gastroenterology Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Thompson A; Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Heddle R; Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Fraser RJ; Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Omari TI; Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 28(2): 225-33, 2016 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26547361
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Assessment of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) motility is challenging, as functionally, UES relaxation and opening are distinct. We studied novel parameters, UES admittance (inverse of nadir impedance), and 0.2-s integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), in patients with cricopharyngeal bar (CPB) and motor neuron disease (MND), as predictors of UES dysfunction.

METHODS:

Sixty-six healthy subjects (n = 50 controls 20-80 years; n = 16 elderly >80 years), 11 patients with CPB (51-83 years) and 16 with MND (58-91 years) were studied using pharyngeal high-resolution impedance manometry. Subjects received 5 × 5 mL liquid (L) and viscous (V) boluses. Admittance and IRP were compared by age and between groups. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. KEY

RESULTS:

In healthy subjects, admittance was reduced (L p = 0.005 and V p = 0.04) and the IRP higher with liquids (p = 0.02) in older age. Admittance was reduced in MND compared to both healthy groups (Young p < 0.0001 for both, Elderly L p < 0.0001 and V p = 0.009) and CPB with liquid (p = 0.001). Only liquid showed a higher IRP in MND patients compared to controls (p = 0.03), but was similar to healthy elderly and CPB patients. Only admittance differentiated younger controls from CPB (L p = 0.0002 and V p < 0.0001), with no differences in either parameter between CPB and elderly subjects. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES The effects of aging and pathology were better discriminated by UES maximum admittance, demonstrating greater statistical confidence across bolus consistencies as compared to 0.2-s IRP. Maximum admittance may be a clinically useful determinate of UES dysfunction.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Envelhecimento / Transtornos de Deglutição / Deglutição / Esfíncter Esofágico Superior Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Envelhecimento / Transtornos de Deglutição / Deglutição / Esfíncter Esofágico Superior Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article