Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A predictive model for pressure ulcer outcome: the Wound Healing Index.
Horn, Susan D; Barrett, Ryan S; Fife, Caroline E; Thomson, Brett.
Afiliação
  • Horn SD; Susan D. Horn, PhD • Adjunct Professor • Department of Population Health Sciences Health System Innovation and Research Program • University of Utah School of Medicine • Salt Lake City • Senior Scientist • Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research • Salt Lake City, Utah Ryan S. Barrett, MStat • Quantitative Modeling Analyst • Zions Bancorporation • Salt Lake City, Utah • Senior Analyst • Institute for Clinical Outcomes Research • Salt Lake City, Utah Caroline E. Fife, MD • Chief Medical Officer •
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 28(12): 560-72; quiz 573-4, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26562203
PURPOSE: The purpose of this learning activity is to provide information regarding the creation of a risk-stratification system to predict the likelihood of the healing of body and heel pressure ulcers (PrUs). TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. OBJECTIVES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant should be better able to:1. Explain the need for a PrU risk stratification tool.2. Describe the purpose and methodology of the study.3. Delineate the results of the study and development of the Wound Healing Index. OBJECTIVE: : To create a validated system to predict the healing likelihood of patients with body and heel pressure ulcers (PrUs), incorporating only patient- and wound-specific variables. DESIGN: The US Wound Registry data were examined retrospectively and assigned a clear outcome (healed, amputated, and so on). Significant variables were identified with bivariate analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were created based on significant factors (P < .05) and tested on a 10% randomly selected hold-out sample. SETTING: Fifty-six wound clinics in 24 states PATIENTS: : A total of 7973 body PrUs and 2350 heel PrUs were eligible for analysis. INTERVENTION: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: : Healed PrU MAIN RESULTS:: Because of missing data elements, the logistic regression development model included 6640 body PrUs, of which 4300 healed (64.8%), and the 10% validation sample included 709 PrUs, of which 477 healed (67.3%). For heel PrUs, the logistic regression development model included 1909 heel PrUs, of which 1240 healed (65.0%), and the 10% validation sample included 203 PrUs, of which 133 healed (65.5%). Variables significantly predicting healing were PrU size, PrU age, number of concurrent wounds of any etiology, PrU Stage III or IV, evidence of bioburden/infection, patient age, being nonambulatory, having renal transplant, paralysis, malnutrition, and/or patient hospitalization for any reason. CONCLUSIONS: Body and heel PrU Wound Healing Indices are comprehensive, user-friendly, and validated predictive models for likelihood of body and heel PrU healing. They can risk-stratify patients in clinical research trials, stratify patient data for quality reporting and benchmarking activities, and identify patients most likely to require advanced therapeutics to achieve healing.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatrização / Modelos Logísticos / Úlcera por Pressão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatrização / Modelos Logísticos / Úlcera por Pressão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article