Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Patients with an α-Galactosidase A Variant, Small Nerve Fibre Assessment Cannot Confirm a Diagnosis of Fabry Disease.
van der Tol, Linda; Verhamme, Camiel; van Schaik, Ivo N; van der Kooi, Anneke J; Hollak, Carla E M; Biegstraaten, Marieke.
Afiliação
  • van der Tol L; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam lysosome center 'Sphinx', Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Verhamme C; Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Schaik IN; Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Kooi AJ; Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hollak CE; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam lysosome center 'Sphinx', Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Biegstraaten M; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam lysosome center 'Sphinx', Amsterdam, The Netherlands. M.Biegstraaten@amc.uva.nl.
JIMD Rep ; 28: 95-103, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26563328
BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by an α-galactosidase A enzyme deficiency due to pathogenic variants in the α-galactosidase A gene (GLA). An increasing number of individuals with a GLA variant, but without characteristic FD features, are identified. A definite diagnosis of FD has important consequences for treatment and counselling. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the diagnostic value of quantitative sensory testing (QST) and intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) for patients with an uncertain FD diagnosis. METHODS: All patients with a GLA variant who initially presented at the Academic Medical Center with an uncertain FD diagnosis were included. A biopsy of an affected organ in a patient or family member showing FD characteristic storage is used as a reference standard for a diagnosis of FD. All patients underwent a comprehensive QST protocol and IENFD assessment which was compared to age and gender-matched healthy controls. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for a combination of ≥1 abnormal QST modality and an abnormal IENFD. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients participated (nonclassical FD n = 18, 9 males; no FD n = 5, 3 males; uncertain n = 3, 1 male). Of the patients classified as nonclassical FD, 28% had ≥1 abnormal QST modalities, and 83% had an abnormal IENFD. From the patients without FD, 20% had ≥1 abnormal QST modality, and IENFD was abnormal in 25% (1 not available). Sensitivity was 28% and specificity 80%. CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, QST and IENFD could not reliably distinguish patients with FD from those without FD.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article