Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
Durr, Nicholas J; Dave, Shivang R; Vera-Diaz, Fuensanta A; Lim, Daryl; Dorronsoro, Carlos; Marcos, Susana; Thorn, Frank; Lage, Eduardo.
Afiliação
  • Durr NJ; *PhD †OD, PhD Madrid-MIT M+Visión Consortium, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts (NJD, SRD, DL, EL); Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (NJD); New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts (FAV-D, FT); Instituto de Óptica "Daza de Valdés," Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain (CD, SM); and Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols," UAM/CSIC, Madrid, Spain (EL).
Optom Vis Sci ; 92(12): 1140-7, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26580271
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To introduce a novel autorefractor design that is intended to be manufacturable at low cost and evaluate its performance in measuring refractive errors.

METHODS:

We developed a handheld, open-view autorefractor (the "QuickSee" [QS]) that uses a simplified approach to wavefront sensing that forgoes moving parts and expensive components. Adult subjects (n = 41) were recruited to undergo noncycloplegic refraction with three

methods:

(1) a QS prototype, (2) a Grand Seiko WR-5100K (GS) autorefractor, and (3) subjective refraction (SR). Agreements between the QS and GS were evaluated using a Bland-Altman analysis. The accuracy of both autorefractors was evaluated using SR as the clinical gold standard.

RESULTS:

The spherical equivalent powers measured from both autorefractors correlate well with SR, with identical correlation coefficients of r = 0.97. Both autorefractors also agree well with each other, with a spherical equivalent power 95% confidence interval of ±0.84 diopters (D). The difference between the accuracy of each objective device is not statistically significant for any component of the power vector (p = 0.55, 0.41, and 0.18, for M, J0, and J45, respectively). The spherical and cylindrical powers measured by the GS agree within 0.25 D of the SR in 49 and 82% of the eyes, respectively, whereas the spherical and cylindrical powers measured by the QS agree within 0.25 D of the SR in 74 and 87% of the eyes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The prototype autorefractor exhibits equivalent performance to the GS autorefractor in matching power vectors measured by SR.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração / Testes Visuais / Desenho de Equipamento Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erros de Refração / Testes Visuais / Desenho de Equipamento Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article