Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosing perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients: a new model.
van den Bogaard, Veerle A B; Euser, Sjoerd M; van der Ploeg, Tjeerd; de Korte, Niels; Sanders, Dave G M; de Winter, Derek; Vergroesen, Diederik; van Groningen, Krijn; de Winter, Peter.
Afiliação
  • van den Bogaard VA; Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands. Electronic address: appendicitis.studie@gmail.com.
  • Euser SM; Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
  • van der Ploeg T; Foreest Medical School, Alkmaar Medical Centre, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
  • de Korte N; Department of Surgery, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
  • Sanders DG; Department of Radiology, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
  • de Winter D; Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
  • Vergroesen D; Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
  • van Groningen K; Department of Pathology, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
  • de Winter P; Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
J Pediatr Surg ; 51(3): 444-8, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26628202
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Studies have investigated sensitivity and specificity of symptoms and tests for diagnosing appendicitis in children. Less is known with regard to the predictive value of these symptoms and tests with respect to the severity of appendicitis. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of patient's characteristics and tests for discriminating between perforated and nonperforated appendicitis in children. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Pediatric patients who underwent an appendectomy at Spaarne Hospital Hoofddorp, the Netherlands, between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013, were included. Baseline patient's characteristics, history, physical examination, laboratory data and results of ultrasounds were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine predictors of perforation.

RESULTS:

In total, 375 patients were included in this study of which 97 children (25.9%) had significant signs of perforation. Univariate analysis showed that age, duration of complaints, temperature, vomiting, CRP, WBC, different findings on ultrasound and the diameter of the appendix were good predictors of a perforated appendicitis. The final multivariate prediction model included temperature, CRP, clearly visible appendix and free fluids on ultrasound and diameter of the appendix and resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 showing sensitivity and specificity of respectively 85.2% and 81.2%.

CONCLUSION:

This prediction model can be used for identification of 'high-risk' children for a perforated appendicitis and might be helpful to prevent complications and longer hospitalization by bringing these children to theater earlier.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicite / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicite / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article