Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are We Ready for Mass Fatality Incidents? Preparedness of the US Mass Fatality Infrastructure.
Merrill, Jacqueline A; Orr, Mark; Chen, Daniel Y; Zhi, Qi; Gershon, Robyn R.
Afiliação
  • Merrill JA; 1Department of Nursing in Biomedical Informatics,Columbia University Medical Center,New York,New York.
  • Orr M; 2Social and Decision Analytics Laboratory,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University-National Capital Region,Arlington,Virginia.
  • Chen DY; 2Social and Decision Analytics Laboratory,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University-National Capital Region,Arlington,Virginia.
  • Zhi Q; 3Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies,School of Medicine,University of California,San Francisco.
  • Gershon RR; 4Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,School of Medicine,University of California,San Francisco.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 10(1): 87-97, 2016 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26708604
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the preparedness of the US mass fatality infrastructure, we developed and tested metrics for 3 components of preparedness organizational, operational, and resource sharing networks.

METHODS:

In 2014, data were collected from 5 response sectors medical examiners and coroners, the death care industry, health departments, faith-based organizations, and offices of emergency management. Scores were calculated within and across sectors and a weighted score was developed for the infrastructure.

RESULTS:

A total of 879 respondents reported highly variable organizational capabilities 15% had responded to a mass fatality incident (MFI); 42% reported staff trained for an MFI, but only 27% for an MFI involving hazardous contaminants. Respondents estimated that 75% of their staff would be willing and able to respond, but only 53% if contaminants were involved. Most perceived their organization as somewhat prepared, but 13% indicated "not at all." Operational capability scores ranged from 33% (death care industry) to 77% (offices of emergency management). Network capability analysis found that only 42% of possible reciprocal relationships between resource-sharing partners were present. The cross-sector composite score was 51%; that is, half the key capabilities for preparedness were in place.

CONCLUSIONS:

The sectors in the US mass fatality infrastructure report suboptimal capability to respond. National leadership is needed to ensure sector-specific and infrastructure-wide preparedness for a large-scale MFI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde / Defesa Civil / Incidentes com Feridos em Massa / Política de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde / Defesa Civil / Incidentes com Feridos em Massa / Política de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article