Comparison of the Utility of Two Assessments for Explaining and Predicting Productivity Change: Well-Being Versus an HRA.
J Occup Environ Med
; 58(1): 69-75, 2016 Jan.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26716851
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To compare utility of employee well-being to health risk assessment (HRA) as predictors of productivity change.METHODS:
Panel data from 2189 employees who completed surveys 2 years apart were used in hierarchical models comparing the influence of well-being and health risk on longitudinal changes in presenteeism and job performance. Absenteeism change was evaluated in a nonexempt subsample.RESULTS:
Change in well-being was the most significant independent predictor of productivity change across all three measures. Comparing hierarchical models, well-being models performed significantly better than HRA models. The HRA added no incremental explanatory power over well-being in combined models. Alone, nonphysical health well-being components outperformed the HRA for all productivity measures.CONCLUSIONS:
Well-being offers a more comprehensive measure of factors that influence productivity and can be considered preferential to HRA in understanding and addressing suboptimal productivity.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Nível de Saúde
/
Indicadores Básicos de Saúde
/
Absenteísmo
/
Eficiência
/
Presenteísmo
Tipo de estudo:
Etiology_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adolescent
/
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2016
Tipo de documento:
Article