Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Comparison of 2 systems of blood culture: Signal and Bactec]. / Comparaison de deux systèmes d'hémoculture: Signal et Bactec.
Croizé, J; Cadoux, B; Leclerc, P; François, P; Brion, J P; Le Noc, P.
Afiliação
  • Croizé J; Laboratoire de Bactériologie, CHRU Grenoble.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 47(6): 311-6, 1989.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2675682
Two Bactec bottles (aerobic and anaerobic) and one single bottle Signal were used for detecting bacteremia in 405 patients (47 children and 358 adults). The two blood culture Signal and Bactec aerobic were continuous shaking for up to 24 hours. 10.3 p. cent of patients had positive cultures (62.3 p. cent Gram +, aero-anaerobic bacteria). Nine bacteremia were detected by only one system (4 for signal, 4 for Bactec) 77.1 p. cent of 83 strains were positive on the two systems together, but 7.2 p. cent only in the Bactec and 15.6 p. cent only in the Signal. The delay of growth give an advantage to the Bactec (67 p. cent in 24 hours). The advantages and the disadvantages of the two systems were analysed.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas Bacteriológicas / Sepse Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Idioma: Fr Ano de publicação: 1989 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas Bacteriológicas / Sepse Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Idioma: Fr Ano de publicação: 1989 Tipo de documento: Article