[Comparison of 2 systems of blood culture: Signal and Bactec]. / Comparaison de deux systèmes d'hémoculture: Signal et Bactec.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris)
; 47(6): 311-6, 1989.
Article
em Fr
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-2675682
Two Bactec bottles (aerobic and anaerobic) and one single bottle Signal were used for detecting bacteremia in 405 patients (47 children and 358 adults). The two blood culture Signal and Bactec aerobic were continuous shaking for up to 24 hours. 10.3 p. cent of patients had positive cultures (62.3 p. cent Gram +, aero-anaerobic bacteria). Nine bacteremia were detected by only one system (4 for signal, 4 for Bactec) 77.1 p. cent of 83 strains were positive on the two systems together, but 7.2 p. cent only in the Bactec and 15.6 p. cent only in the Signal. The delay of growth give an advantage to the Bactec (67 p. cent in 24 hours). The advantages and the disadvantages of the two systems were analysed.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Técnicas Bacteriológicas
/
Sepse
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
Limite:
Adolescent
/
Adult
/
Child
/
Child, preschool
/
Humans
/
Infant
Idioma:
Fr
Ano de publicação:
1989
Tipo de documento:
Article