Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the impact of a flowchart-type leaflet for cancer inpatients.
Suzuki, Shinya; Enokida, Tomohiro; Kobayashi, Takehiko; Yajima, Yoko; Ishiki, Hiroto; Izumi, Keishiro; Endo, Kazushi; Tahara, Makoto.
Afiliação
  • Suzuki S; Pharmacy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
  • Enokida T; Head and Neck Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
  • Kobayashi T; Head and Neck Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
  • Yajima Y; Head and Neck Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
  • Ishiki H; Head and Neck Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
  • Izumi K; Pharmacy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
  • Endo K; Department of Drug Safety Management, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Tahara M; Head and Neck Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
SAGE Open Med ; 2: 2050312114531256, 2014.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26770723
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of an interactive and visual flowchart-type leaflet for head and neck cancer inpatients who received induction chemotherapy, docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorourasil (DCF), or docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) from September 2009 to April 2012. The flowchart-type leaflet group used a flowchart-type leaflet during chemotherapy, while the non-flowchart-type leaflet group did not.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed using patient records. The endpoints of this study were to determine the following the number of emergency hospital admissions/visits, incidence of Grade 2 or higher non-haematological adverse drug reactions, nonadherence to treatment, and the number of telephone calls from subjects.

RESULTS:

A total of 109 subjects were identified as follows 49 in the flowchart-type leaflet group (139 chemotherapy sessions) and 60 in the non-flowchart-type leaflet group (163 chemotherapy sessions). No significant differences were observed in age, performance status, or chemotherapy regimen. The incidence of emergency hospital admissions was significantly lower in the flowchart-type leaflet than in the non-flowchart-type leaflet group (1% vs 10%, p < 0.01). No difference was seen between groups (12% vs 19%, p = 0.1) in the nonadherence rate of supportive medication for adverse drug reactions. Telephone call rates were significantly higher in the flowchart-type leaflet (16%, 30 calls) than in the non-flowchart-type leaflet group (7%, 11 calls) in each chemotherapy regimen. Of the 30 calls from patients in the FCL group, 24 (80%) were made to the hospital, compared with only 5 (45%) of the 11 calls from patients in the non-flowchart-type leaflet group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that the flowchart-type leaflet can reduce nonadherence and improve patient judgment during chemotherapy, leading to a decrease in emergency hospital admissions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article