Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart once daily in Type 2 diabetes: a comparison of simple or stepwise titration algorithms (BOOST® : SIMPLE USE).
Park, S W; Bebakar, W M W; Hernandez, P G; Macura, S; Hersløv, M L; de la Rosa, R.
Afiliação
  • Park SW; Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Bebakar WM; Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus USM, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Hernandez PG; Endocrinology Service, Hospital Universitario 'Dr José E. González', Monterrey, México.
  • Macura S; Medical Affairs, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
  • Hersløv ML; Medical & Science, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
  • de la Rosa R; Four Rivers Clinical Research, Paducah, KY, USA.
Diabet Med ; 34(2): 174-179, 2017 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26773557
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To compare the efficacy and safety of two titration algorithms for insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) administered once daily with metformin in participants with insulin-naïve Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS:

This open-label, parallel-group, 26-week, multicentre, treat-to-target trial, randomly allocated participants (11) to two titration arms. The Simple algorithm titrated IDegAsp twice weekly based on a single pre-breakfast self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) measurement. The Stepwise algorithm titrated IDegAsp once weekly based on the lowest of three consecutive pre-breakfast SMPG measurements. In both groups, IDegAsp once daily was titrated to pre-breakfast plasma glucose values of 4.0-5.0 mmol/l. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c (%) after 26 weeks.

RESULTS:

Change in HbA1c at Week 26 was IDegAspSimple -14.6 mmol/mol (-1.3%) (to 52.4 mmol/mol; 6.9%) and IDegAspStepwise -11.9 mmol/mol (-1.1%) (to 54.7 mmol/mol; 7.2%). The estimated between-group treatment difference was -1.97 mmol/mol [95% confidence interval (CI) -4.1, 0.2] (-0.2%, 95% CI -0.4, 0.02), confirming the non-inferiority of IDegAspSimple to IDegAspStepwise (non-inferiority limit of ≤ 0.4%). Mean reduction in fasting plasma glucose and 8-point SMPG profiles were similar between groups. Rates of confirmed hypoglycaemia were lower for IDegAspStepwise [2.1 per patient years of exposure (PYE)] vs. IDegAspSimple (3.3 PYE) (estimated rate ratio IDegAspSimple /IDegAspStepwise 1.8; 95% CI 1.1, 2.9). Nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates were similar between groups. No severe hypoglycaemic events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

In participants with insulin-naïve Type 2 diabetes mellitus, the IDegAspSimple titration algorithm improved HbA1c levels as effectively as a Stepwise titration algorithm. Hypoglycaemia rates were lower in the Stepwise arm.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Insulina de Ação Prolongada / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemiantes Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Insulina de Ação Prolongada / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemiantes Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article