Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ocular Dominance Is Associated with the Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Profile in the Macula.
Choi, Jin A; Kim, Jung-Sub; Jeong, Hyun Jin; Lee, Jin Ah; Park, Chan Kee.
Afiliação
  • Choi JA; Department of Ophthalmology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JS; B & VIIT Eye Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeong HJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JA; Department of Ophthalmology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
  • Park CK; Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One ; 11(2): e0150035, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26918335
PURPOSE: To investigate the characteristics of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness profiles associated with ocular dominance. SETTING: Private practice, Seoul, Republic of Korea. DESIGN: Comparative case-control study. METHODS: Both eyes of 199 participants with no ophthalmic abnormalities were included. Participants were imaged by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and underwent dominant eye testing using a hole-in-a-card test (sighting dominance) at the same visit. Macular GCIPL, as well as circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were compared for individual patients, according to ocular dominance. RESULTS: Ocular dominance occurred predominantly in the right eye (right vs. left: 72.36 vs. 27.60%; P < 0.001). In the comparison of macular GCIPL thickness, the average (81.27±5.01 µm vs. 80.66±6.31 µm in dominant vs. non-dominant eyes), inferonasal (81.39±5.47µm vs. 80.33±6.82µm, and inferior sectors (77.95±6.05µm vs. 76.97±8.15µm) were significantly different between dominant and non-dominant eyes (P = 0.040, 0.005, and 0.032, respectively). Significant predictors of average GCIPL thickness were spherical equivalent (ß = 1.37, P<0.001), astigmatic power (ß = 1.44, P = 0.009), disc area (ß = 3.90, P < 0.001), average RNFL thickness (ß = 0.22, P<0.001), average cup-to-disc ratio (ß = 5.74, P = 0.002), difference between the inferior and superior quadrant RNFL thicknesses (ß = 0.08, P = 0.024), and ocular dominance (ß = 2.10, P = 0.020). On multivariate regression analysis, ocular dominance was correlated with average GCIPL thickness after adjusting for potential confounders (ß = 1.63, P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Dominant eyes accompanied significantly thicker average macular GCIPL. This information suggests that macular GCIPL thickness may provide an indicator of the relative dominance of an eye.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Células Ganglionares da Retina / Dominância Ocular / Macula Lutea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Células Ganglionares da Retina / Dominância Ocular / Macula Lutea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article