Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Group-Based Trajectory Modeling of Suppression Ratio After Cardiac Arrest.
Elmer, Jonathan; Gianakas, John J; Rittenberger, Jon C; Baldwin, Maria E; Faro, John; Plummer, Cheryl; Shutter, Lori A; Wassel, Christina L; Callaway, Clifton W; Fabio, Anthony.
Afiliação
  • Elmer J; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. elmerjp@upmc.edu.
  • Gianakas JJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Iroquois Building, Suite 400A, 3600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. elmerjp@upmc.edu.
  • Rittenberger JC; Epidemiology Data Center, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Baldwin ME; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Iroquois Building, Suite 400A, 3600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
  • Faro J; Department of Neurology, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Plummer C; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Iroquois Building, Suite 400A, 3600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
  • Shutter LA; Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Wassel CL; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Callaway CW; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Fabio A; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Neurocrit Care ; 25(3): 415-423, 2016 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27033709
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Existing studies of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) as a prognostic tool after cardiac arrest (CA) use methods that ignore the longitudinal pattern of qEEG data, resulting in significant information loss and precluding analysis of clinically important temporal trends. We tested the utility of group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) for qEEG classification, focusing on the specific example of suppression ratio (SR).

METHODS:

We included comatose CA patients hospitalized from April 2010 to October 2014, excluding CA from trauma or neurological catastrophe. We used Persyst®v12 to generate SR trends and used semi-quantitative methods to choose appropriate sampling and averaging strategies. We used GBTM to partition SR data into different trajectories and regression associate trajectories with outcome. We derived a multivariate logistic model using clinical variables without qEEG to predict survival, then added trajectories and/or non-longitudinal SR estimates, and assessed changes in model performance.

RESULTS:

Overall, 289 CA patients had ≥36 h of EEG yielding 10,404 h of data (mean age 57 years, 81 % arrested out-of-hospital, 33 % shockable rhythms, 31 % overall survival, 17 % discharged to home or acute rehabilitation). We identified 4 distinct SR trajectories associated with survival (62, 26, 12, and 0 %, P < 0.0001 across groups) and CPC (35, 10, 4, and 0 %, P < 0.0001 across groups). Adding trajectories significantly improved model performance compared to adding non-longitudinal data.

CONCLUSIONS:

Longitudinal analysis of continuous qEEG data using GBTM provides more predictive information than analysis of qEEG at single time-points after CA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipóxia Encefálica / Coma / Eletroencefalografia / Parada Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipóxia Encefálica / Coma / Eletroencefalografia / Parada Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article