Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic evaluation of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in Australia.
Merlo, Gregory; Graves, Nicholas; Brain, David; Connelly, Luke B.
Afiliação
  • Merlo G; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and the Centre of Research Excellence in Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Graves N; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and the Centre of Research Excellence in Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Brain D; Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and the Centre of Research Excellence in Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Connelly LB; The University of Queensland, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences and Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 31(12): 1927-1932, 2016 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27043242
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIM:

Clostridium difficile is the most common cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea in Australia. In 2013, a randomized controlled trial demonstrated the effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplantation-via either nasoduodenal or colorectal delivery-compared with vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent CDI in Australia.

METHODS:

A Markov model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplantation compared with standard antibiotic therapy. A literature review of clinical evidence informed the structure of the model and the choice of parameter values. Clinical effectiveness was measured in terms of quality-adjusted life years. Uncertainty in the model was explored using probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS:

Both nasoduodenal and colorectal FMT resulted in improved quality of life and reduced cost compared with vancomycin. The incremental effectiveness of either FMT delivery compared with vancomycin was 1.2 (95% CI 0.1, 2.3) quality-adjusted life years, or 1.4 (95% CI 0.4, 2.4) life years saved. Treatment with vancomycin resulted in an increased cost of AU$4094 (95% CI AU$26, AU$8161) compared with nasoduodenal delivery of FMT and AU$4045 (95% CI -AU$33, AU$8124) compared with colorectal delivery. The mean difference in cost between colorectal and nasoduodenal FMT was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

If FMT, rather than vancomycin, became standard care for recurrent CDI in Australia, the estimated national healthcare savings would be over AU$4000 per treated person, with a substantial increase in quality of life.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa / Clostridioides difficile / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Transplante de Microbiota Fecal / Microbioma Gastrointestinal / Intestinos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa / Clostridioides difficile / Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Transplante de Microbiota Fecal / Microbioma Gastrointestinal / Intestinos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article