Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Importance of Calibration Method in Central Blood Pressure for Cardiac Structural Abnormalities.
Negishi, Kazuaki; Yang, Hong; Wang, Ying; Nolan, Mark T; Negishi, Tomoko; Pathan, Faraz; Marwick, Thomas H; Sharman, James E.
Afiliação
  • Negishi K; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Kazuaki.Negishi@utas.edu.au.
  • Yang H; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Wang Y; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Nolan MT; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Negishi T; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Pathan F; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Marwick TH; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Sharman JE; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Am J Hypertens ; 29(9): 1070-6, 2016 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27085076
BACKGROUND: Central blood pressure (CBP) independently predicts cardiovascular risk, but calibration methods may affect accuracy of central systolic blood pressure (CSBP). Standard central systolic blood pressure (Stan-CSBP) from peripheral waveforms is usually derived with calibration using brachial SBP and diastolic BP (DBP). However, calibration using oscillometric mean arterial pressure (MAP) and DBP (MAP-CSBP) is purported to provide more accurate representation of true invasive CSBP. This study sought to determine which derived CSBP could more accurately discriminate cardiac structural abnormalities. METHODS: A total of 349 community-based patients with risk factors (71±5years, 161 males) had CSBP measured by brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph, IEM GmbH, Stolberg, Germany) using 2 calibration methods: MAP-CSBP and Stan-CSBP. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left atrial dilatation (LAD) were measured based on standard guidelines. RESULTS: MAP-CSBP was higher than Stan-CSBP (149±20 vs. 128±15mm Hg, P < 0.0001). Although they were modestly correlated (rho = 0.74, P < 0.001), the Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a large bias (21mm Hg) and limits of agreement (24mm Hg). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, MAP-CSBP significantly better discriminated LVH compared with Stan-CSBP (area under the curve (AUC) 0.66 vs. 0.59, P = 0.0063) and brachial SBP (0.62, P = 0.027). Continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) (P < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) (P < 0.001) corroborated superior discrimination of LVH by MAP-CSBP. Similarly, MAP-CSBP better distinguished LAD than Stan-CSBP (AUC 0.63 vs. 0.56, P = 0.005) and conventional brachial SBP (0.58, P = 0.006), whereas Stan-CSBP provided no better discrimination than conventional brachial BP (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: CSBP is calibration dependent and when oscillometric MAP and DBP are used, the derived CSBP is a better discriminator for cardiac structural abnormalities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pressão Sanguínea / Determinação da Pressão Arterial / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pressão Sanguínea / Determinação da Pressão Arterial / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article