Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radical Prostatectomy in Korean Men Aged 75-Years or Older: Safety and Efficacy in Comparison with Patients Aged 65-69 Years.
Ryu, Jae Hyun; Kim, Yun Beom; Jung, Tae Young; Kim, Sun Il; Byun, Seok-Soo; Kwon, Dong Deuk; Kim, Duk Yoon; Oh, Tae Hee; Yoo, Tag Keun; Ko, Woo Jin.
Afiliação
  • Ryu JH; Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea .
  • Kim YB; Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea .
  • Jung TY; Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea .
  • Kim SI; Department of Urology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea .
  • Byun SS; Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea .
  • Kwon DD; Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea .
  • Kim DY; Department of Urology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea .
  • Oh TH; Department of Urology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea .
  • Yoo TK; Department of Urology, Eulji General Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea .
  • Ko WJ; Department of Urology, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea .
J Korean Med Sci ; 31(6): 957-62, 2016 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27247506
ABSTRACT
Prostate cancer is the most common type of male cancer worldwide. Although radical prostatectomy (RP) is advised for prostate cancer in patients with a life expectancy of more than 10 years by various guidelines, most elderly men still do not undergo the procedure regardless of increasing life expectancy. This study aimed to determine whether RP is suitable for patients with prostate cancer aged 75 years or older. A retrospective study of patients who underwent RP at 6 institutions between 2005 and 2012 was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups at the time of surgery 65-69 years (younger group) and 75 years or older (older group). We compared clinical characteristics, pathological results, complication rates, and recurrence-free survival between the two groups. Compared with the younger group, the older group had significantly higher preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level, pre- and postoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status grade, hypertension prevalence, and Gleason score at biopsy and RP. However, except urinary incontinence, there were no statistically significant differences in the peri- and post-operative complications. After median follow-up periods of 36 months (younger group) and 40 months (older group), the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were not significantly different (P = 0.581). Although the urinary incontinence rate was higher in the older group, RP was a suitable option for selected Korean men aged 75 years or older with limited complication rates and excellent outcomes similar to those for patients aged 65-69 years.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article