Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidental Suspicious Regional Lymph Nodes on Breast Sonography: Is Sampling Necessary?
Raj, Sean D; Amer, Ahmed M; Garg, Naveen; Krishnamurthy, Savitri; Hess, Kenneth R; Park, Young Mi; Moseley, Tanya; Whitman, Gary J.
Afiliação
  • Raj SD; Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Department of Radiology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: sean.raj@gmail.com.
  • Amer AM; Department of Radiology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Garg N; Department of Radiology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Krishnamurthy S; Department of Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Hess KR; Department of Biostatistics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Park YM; Department of Radiology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Moseley T; Department of Radiology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Whitman GJ; Department of Radiology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 46(2): 100-104, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27338308
ABSTRACT
Suspicious regional lymph nodes may be incidentally identified on breast ultrasound examinations in patients who present for sonographic evaluation without a known or a suspected breast malignancy, and there is a paucity of data on whether biopsy should be performed. This study aims to characterize incidental sonographically detected suspicious regional lymph nodes and determine whether tissue sampling or follow-up imaging is required. A total of 40,773 consecutive breast ultrasounds were reviewed. Overall, 7 women with nonpalpable, incidental, suspicious axillary or supraclavicular lymph nodes in an otherwise unremarkable breast and without history of malignancy or systemic disease were identified. In all, 5 women with 6 nodes underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and 2 women with 3 nodes were recommended follow-up ultrasound. Follow-up imaging, cytology, and all-cause clinical data were reviewed to evaluate outcomes. All 6 biopsied lymph nodes (mean = 1.5cm) were benign on cytology. Follow-up imaging was available for 3 nodes (mean = 2.6 years), with all-cause follow-up for all nodes of 2.2 years. In the follow-up group, 3 lymph nodes (mean = 1.6cm) were monitored (mean = 4.3 years) with all-cause follow-up of 4.7 years. No new cancers, growth, or suspicious features were found in these nodes during follow-up for either group of women. In conclusion, women without history of prior malignancy or systemic disease with incidentally detected, nonpalpable, suspicious regional lymph nodes with an otherwise normal breast ultrasound examination underwent fine needle aspiration or were recommended short-term follow-up ultrasound. No indeterminate features or malignancies were observed at the time of tissue sampling or developed over several years of follow-up. Avoiding sampling of these nodes would reduce patient morbidity and health care costs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Ultrassonografia Mamária / Biópsia Guiada por Imagem / Metástase Linfática Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Ultrassonografia Mamária / Biópsia Guiada por Imagem / Metástase Linfática Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article