Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Birch pollen immunotherapy inhibits anaphylaxis to the cross-reactive apple allergen Mal d 1 in mice.
Utsch, L; Logiantara, A; Wallner, M; Hofer, H; van Ree, R; van Rijt, L S.
Afiliação
  • Utsch L; Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. lara.utsch@gmail.com.
  • Logiantara A; Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Wallner M; Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Hofer H; Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
  • van Ree R; Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Rijt LS; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 46(11): 1474-1483, 2016 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27376790
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cross-reactive apple allergy is a common co-morbidity of birch pollen allergy, caused by the presence of a Bet v 1 homologue allergen in apple, Mal d 1. Treatment of tree pollen hay fever by immunotherapy is well established, but its effect on the accompanying apple allergy is debated.

OBJECTIVE:

To establish a mouse model of birch pollen induced cross-reactivity to Mal d 1 and investigate the effect of birch pollen immunotherapy on the cross-reactivity to Mal d 1.

METHODS:

Respiratory allergy was induced in Balb/c mice by intraperitoneal exposure to alum-adsorbed birch pollen extract (BPE) in combination with short or prolonged intranasal exposure to BPE. To evaluate the response to Mal d 1, mice were exposed intraperitoneally to Mal d 1. Immunoglobulin responses and cytokine production by splenocytes were measured by ELISA. Allergic symptoms were evaluated by measuring airway hyper-reactivity and hypothermia as a surrogate marker for anaphylaxis. Immunotherapy was performed subcutaneously with alum-adsorbed BPE.

RESULTS:

Mice exposed to BPE develop cross-reactive IgE to Mal d 1. Early after exposure to BPE, this response is still weak and does not yet translate into anaphylaxis. Interestingly, later re-challenge with BPE increased cross-reactivity to a level where Mal d 1 exposure induced anaphylaxis. Cross-sensitization can also be induced by systemic Mal d 1 exposure. Birch pollen immunotherapy significantly reduced the anaphylactic response of mice to Mal d 1. CONCLUSION & CLINICAL RELEVANCE A mouse model mimicking birch pollen induced cross-reactivity to Mal d 1 was successfully established. In this model, birch pollen immunotherapy significantly ameliorated the anaphylaxis induced by Mal d 1. Our experimental data suggest that boosting of Mal d 1 recognizing immunoglobulins by BP SCIT is important for the amelioration of apple allergy in human.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas de Plantas / Pólen / Alérgenos / Dessensibilização Imunológica / Reações Cruzadas / Betula / Malus / Antígenos de Plantas / Anafilaxia Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas de Plantas / Pólen / Alérgenos / Dessensibilização Imunológica / Reações Cruzadas / Betula / Malus / Antígenos de Plantas / Anafilaxia Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article