Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detecting Preperimetric Glaucoma with Standard Automated Perimetry Using a Deep Learning Classifier.
Asaoka, Ryo; Murata, Hiroshi; Iwase, Aiko; Araie, Makoto.
Afiliação
  • Asaoka R; Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: rasaoka-tky@umin.ac.jp.
  • Murata H; Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Iwase A; Tajimi Iwase Eye Clinic, Tajimi, Japan.
  • Araie M; Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Kanto Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Tokyo, Japan.
Ophthalmology ; 123(9): 1974-80, 2016 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27395766
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To differentiate the visual fields (VFs) of preperimetric open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients from the VFs of healthy eyes using a deep learning (DL) method.

DESIGN:

Cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS:

One hundred seventy-one preperimetric glaucoma VFs (PPGVFs) from 53 eyes in 51 OAG patients and 108 healthy eyes of 87 healthy participants.

METHODS:

Preperimetric glaucoma VFs were defined as all VFs before a first diagnosis of manifest glaucoma (Anderson-Patella's criteria). In total, 171 PPGVFs from 53 eyes in 51 OAG patients and 108 VFs from 108 healthy eyes in 87 healthy participants were analyzed (all VFs were tested using the Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2 program; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). The 52 total deviation, mean deviation, and pattern standard deviation values were used as predictors in the DL classifier a deep feed-forward neural network (FNN), along with other machine learning (ML) methods, including random forests (RF), gradient boosting, support vector machine, and neural network (NN). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of discrimination for each method. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The AUCs obtained with each classifier method.

RESULTS:

A significantly larger AUC of 92.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.8%-95.4%) was obtained using the deep FNN classifier compared with all other ML

methods:

79.0% (95% CI, 73.5%-84.5%) with RF, 77.6% (95% CI, 71.7%-83.5%) with gradient boosting, 71.2% (95% CI, 65.0%-77.5%), and 66.7% (95% CI, 60.1%-73.3%) with NN.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preperimetric glaucoma VFs can be distinguished from healthy VFs with very high accuracy using a deep FNN classifier.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Campos Visuais / Doenças do Nervo Óptico / Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto / Testes de Campo Visual Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Campos Visuais / Doenças do Nervo Óptico / Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto / Testes de Campo Visual Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article