Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Coercive Interventions in Psychiatry: Prevention and Patients' Preferences]. / Psychiatrische Zwangsmaßnahmen: Prävention und Präferenzen aus Patientenperspektive.
Mielau, Juliane; Altunbay, Jasmin; Heinz, Andreas; Reuter, Benedikt; Bermpohl, Felix; Rentzsch, Johannes; Lehmann, Anja; Montag, Christiane.
Afiliação
  • Mielau J; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
  • Altunbay J; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
  • Heinz A; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
  • Reuter B; Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.
  • Bermpohl F; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
  • Rentzsch J; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
  • Lehmann A; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
  • Montag C; Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Psychiatr Prax ; 44(6): 316-322, 2017 Sep.
Article em De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27399593
Objective This study explores patients' preferences and measures of prevention of coercive methods in psychiatric treatment. Methods Structured interviews of 90 patients with psychotic disorders were undertaken, most of whom had previously experienced coercive methods. Results Participants saw preventive potential in a wider availability of individual non-pharmacological therapy, improvement of staff professional competence and communication skills, high staff-to-patient ratios and retreat facilities. The majority of participants preferred forced medication and manual restraint in case of self-endangerment, and forced medication and mechanical restraint in the event of endangerment of others. Conclusion Patients' suggestions relating to prevention of coercion are in line with most expert's opinions. In case coercive methods are required, manual restraint and application of forced medication is accepted as the treatment of choice according to most patients in case of self-endangerment.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicotrópicos / Restrição Física / Coerção / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Preferência do Paciente / Transtornos Mentais / Programas Nacionais de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: De Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicotrópicos / Restrição Física / Coerção / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Preferência do Paciente / Transtornos Mentais / Programas Nacionais de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: De Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article