Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program.
O'Reilly, Sharleen L; Dunbar, James A; Versace, Vincent; Janus, Edward; Best, James D; Carter, Rob; Oats, Jeremy J N; Skinner, Timothy; Ackland, Michael; Phillips, Paddy A; Ebeling, Peter R; Reynolds, John; Shih, Sophy T F; Hagger, Virginia; Coates, Michael; Wildey, Carol.
Afiliação
  • O'Reilly SL; Institute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Dunbar JA; Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Versace V; School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia.
  • Janus E; Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School-Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.
  • Best JD; General Internal Medicine Unit, Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.
  • Carter R; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Imperial College London and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  • Oats JJ; Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Skinner T; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ackland M; School of Psychological and Clinical Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
  • Phillips PA; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ebeling PR; Department of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
  • Reynolds J; SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Shih ST; Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hagger V; Alfred Health and Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Coates M; Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wildey C; Diabetes Australia Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS Med ; 13(7): e1002092, 2016 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27459502
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year. METHODS AND

FINDINGS:

In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows -0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI -0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference -0.95 kg, 95% CI -1.87, -0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); -2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI -3.01, -1.42) compared with -1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI -2.52, -0.96) (change difference -0.50 cm, 95% CI -1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference -0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI -0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000338066.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article