Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
 The product of triglycerides and glucose as biomarker for screening simple steatosis and NASH in asymptomatic women.
Simental-Mendía, Luis E; Simental-Mendía, Esteban; Rodríguez-Hernández, Heriberto; Rodríguez-Morán, Martha; Guerrero-Romero, Fernando.
Afiliação
  • Simental-Mendía LE; Biomedical Research Unit of the Mexican Social Security Institute at Durango, Durango, Dgo., Mexico; Universidad Autónoma España de Durango, Durango, Dgo., Mexico.
  • Simental-Mendía E; Biomedical Research Unit of the Mexican Social Security Institute at Durango, Durango, Dgo., Mexico.
  • Rodríguez-Hernández H; Faculty of Medicine and Nutrition, Juarez University of Durango State, Durango, Dgo., Mexico.
  • Rodríguez-Morán M; Biomedical Research Unit of the Mexican Social Security Institute at Durango, Durango, Dgo., Mexico.
  • Guerrero-Romero F; Biomedical Research Unit of the Mexican Social Security Institute at Durango, Durango, Dgo., Mexico.
Ann Hepatol ; 15(5): 715-20, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27493110
ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED  Introduction and aim. Given that early identification of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an important issue for primary prevention of hepatic disease, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of the product of triglyceride and glucose levels (TyG) for screening simple steatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in asymptomatic women, and to compare its efficacy vs. other biomarkers for recognizing NAFLD. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Asymptomatic women aged 20 to 65 years were enrolled into a cross-sectional study. The optimal values of TyG, for screening simple steatosis and NASH were established on a Receiver Operating Characteristic scatter plot; the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of TyG index were estimated versus liver biopsy. According sensitivity and specificity, the efficacy of TyG was compared versus the well-known clinical biomarkers for recognizing NAFLD.

RESULTS:

A total of 50 asymptomatic women were enrolled. The best cutoff point of TyG for screening simple steatosis was 4.58 (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.69); in addition, the best cutoff point of TyG index for screening NASH was 4.59 (sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.69). The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.03 and 0.08 for simple steatosis, and 2.80 and 0.18 for NASH. As compared versus SteatoTest, NashTest, Fatty liver index, and Algorithm, the TyG showed to be the best test for screening.

CONCLUSIONS:

TyG has high sensitivity and low negative likelihood ratio; as compared with other clinical biomarkers, the TyG showed to be the best test for screening simple steatosis and NASH.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triglicerídeos / Glicemia / Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica / Fígado Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triglicerídeos / Glicemia / Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica / Fígado Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article