Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MRI signal intensity of anterior cruciate ligament graft after transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique (TRANSIG): design of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Ruiter, Simeon J S; Brouwer, Reinoud W; Meys, Tim W G M; Slump, Cornelis H; van Raay, Jos J A M.
Afiliação
  • Ruiter SJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Brouwer RW; Department of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Meys TW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Slump CH; Department of Radiology, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • van Raay JJ; MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 17(1): 334, 2016 08 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27511027
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are two primary surgical techniques to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), transtibial (TT) technique and anteromedial portal (AMP) technique. Currently, there is no consensus which surgical technique elicits the best clinical and functional outcomes. MRI-derived measures of the signal intensity (SI) of the ACL graft have been described as an independent predictor of graft properties. The purpose of this study is to compare the MRI derived SI measurements of the ACL graft one year after ACL reconstruction, in order to compare the outcomes of both the AMP and TT ACL reconstruction technique. METHODS/

DESIGN:

Thirty-six patients will be included in a randomized controlled trial. Patients who are admitted for primary unilateral ACL reconstruction will be included in the study. Exclusion criteria are a history of previous surgery on the ipsilateral knee, re-rupture of the ipsilateral ACL graft, associated ligamentous injuries or meniscal tear of the ipsilateral knee, unhealthy contralateral knee, contra-indications for MRI and a preference for one of the two surgical techniques and/or orthopaedic surgeon. Primary outcome is MRI Signal intensity ratio (SIR) of the ACL graft. Secondary outcome measures are the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Examination Form,the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS). Differences between MRI SIR assessment with the current MRI protocol (proton density weighted imaging protocol) and the additional T2*-weighted gradient-echo protocol will be assessed.

DISCUSSION:

There is no consensus regarding the TT or AMP ACL reconstruction technique. SI measurements with MRI have been used in other clinical studies for evaluation of the ACL graft and maturation after ACL reconstruction compared to clinical and functional outcomes. This randomized controlled trial has been designed to compare the TT technique with the AMP technique with the use of MRI SI of the graft after ACL reconstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry NTR5410 (registered on August 24, 2015).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Transplantes / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Transplantes / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article