Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of induction regimen on transplant outcome in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.
Chakraborty, R; Muchtar, E; Kumar, S; Buadi, F K; Dingli, D; Dispenzieri, A; Hayman, S R; Hogan, W J; Kapoor, P; Lacy, M Q; Leung, N; Gertz, M A.
Afiliação
  • Chakraborty R; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Muchtar E; Hospitalist Services, Essentia Health-St. Joseph's Medical Center, Brainerd, MN, USA.
  • Kumar S; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Buadi FK; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Dingli D; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Dispenzieri A; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Hayman SR; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Hogan WJ; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Kapoor P; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Lacy MQ; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Leung N; Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Gertz MA; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 52(1): 34-40, 2017 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27548464
ABSTRACT
We compared overall survival (OS) of 1017 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who were treated with different novel agent-based induction regimens and who underwent early autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Subgroups were defined by type of induction therapy cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD; n=193), bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vd; n=64), lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd; n=251), bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd; n=126), thalidomide-dexamethasone (Td; n=155) and vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone (VAD/Dex; n=228). The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 66.7 months. The 5-year OS rates with CyBorD, Vd, Rd, VRd, Td and VAD/Dex were 79.2%, 72.3%, 79.2%, 79.0%, 57.4% and 63.4%, respectively (log-rank, P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, after controlling for important patient and disease variables, VRd had a superior OS compared with CyBorD (hazard ratio (HR), 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10-0.88; P=0.03) and Vd (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.52; P=0.002). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that among patients completing induction therapy and continuing to early transplant, VRd induction leads to improved OS compared with CyBorD and Vd regimens.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Condicionamento Pré-Transplante / Transplante de Células-Tronco / Quimioterapia de Indução / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Condicionamento Pré-Transplante / Transplante de Células-Tronco / Quimioterapia de Indução / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article